User talk:Soarwakes

Welcome!

Hello, Soarwakes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:32, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Soarwakes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Muhandes. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, List of Institutes of National Importance, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 16:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added it back with a source. Soarwakes (talk) 03:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The relation of the fact to the article is unclear. Please discuss this on the article's talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 09:18, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Soarwakes, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Soarwakes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Parable due to destruction of the window listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Parable due to destruction of the window. Since you had some involvement with the Parable due to destruction of the window redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB 05:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spinning out articles

Please tell why you reverted me here? You gave no reason,

You also reverted me on Cow protection movement with summary "spinned out long article", but that article is only 73k bytes, it is not large.

There is no difference between "Cow protection movement" and "Cow vigilante violence in India" since both subjects concerns violence before 2014. Coverage after 2014 was more significant that's why they created Cow vigilante violence in India since 2014.

Your edits are against consensus established at Talk:Cow vigilante violence in India since 2014/Archive 1#The main problem with this article is not the title. ML^talk 11:21, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is a different article ML, and redirecting amounts to deletion. But if you still want to delete the article then there are other ways to do it, so please refrain from redirecting the article. Thanks. Soarwakes (talk) 09:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Describe how it is a different. If you want to create articles then there are millions of subject that deserve articles than this WP:CFORK which clearly duplicates another subject. I am aware of "other ways", but that would be basically a waste of time. Why can't you let any other editor revert the redirect if you are confident that you are creating article about a different subject against consensus? ML^talk 16:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting is not allowed in deleting an article. The article is big enough to have a separate article. Soarwakes (talk) 05:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comments

Hello, Soarwakes. You have new messages at Talk:Kink (sexuality)#Conversion of this article to a redirect page.
Message added 11:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Polly Tunnel (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chowkidar Chor Hai into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 12:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have given the source in the edit summary. Please check the history. Soarwakes (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you are supposed to givve attributions by adding a wikilink in the manner as described above. --DBig Xrayᗙ 15:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Chowkidar Chor Hai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
When an article is at WP:AfDed, all possible options are thought of. The WP:AfD was closed as WP:SNOW keep and hence Notable. This article was deemed notable in its own capacity. A merger is now moot. You are free to copy content to other articles but this article will exist independently since it is a notable topic. stop edit warring over this. or you will be reported. DBig Xrayᗙ 15:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ML^talk 17:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uniform criminal code listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uniform criminal code. Since you had some involvement with the Uniform criminal code redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self drive car rental listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self drive car rental. Since you had some involvement with the Self drive car rental redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uttitha bandhasana listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uttitha bandhasana. Since you had some involvement with the Uttitha bandhasana redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:54, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Oven Toast Grill" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oven Toast Grill. Since you had some involvement with the Oven Toast Grill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Widefox; talk 16:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Oven Toast Grill" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oven Toast Grill. Since you had some involvement with the Oven Toast Grill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Invalid^OS (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Six standard deviations" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Six standard deviations. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Six standard deviations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"China occupied Kashmir" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect China occupied Kashmir. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 2#China occupied Kashmir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:33, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Crymea river" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Crymea river and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Crymea river until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CLYDE FRANKLIN 03:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Oven Toast Grill" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Oven Toast Grill has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13 § Oven Toast Grill until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Oven-Toast-Grill" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Oven-Toast-Grill has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13 § Oven-Toast-Grill until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]