User talk:So1idSnake

So1idSnake, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi So1idSnake! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Your addition to Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences & Research has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright violation please check your sources and revert. Thank you.

I did check my sources. The material at:

this site Does not include an acceptable free license as far as I could determine. If you think it does, please point it out.--S Philbrick (Talk) 14:56, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This site is no longer used which you can identify by looking at the prospectus dates mentioned(2012-13) and in considered defunct Instead it has been replaced by adeshuniversity.ac.in and its subpage at aimsr.adeshuniversity.ac.in Plus the website you mentioned does not indicate a copyright policy if there is one.

Also you deleted the entries which were solely entered by me in my own words for eg the affiliation section and the FAIMER section. That is a public information available to everyone. The info table also had no copyright violation it was made by me.

The asserted fact that the site is no longer used is not relevant to the copyright question. We simply cannot use material unless it is clearly licensed or if known to be public domain. I'm sorry that some of the additions were caught up in the rollback but the way rollback works it rollbacks all consecutive edits by an editor. If you don't include copyright violations you will not lose the other edits. I realize you are very new to Wikipedia but it is important to understand that we take copyright very seriously.--S Philbrick (Talk) 15:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the explanation. I understand your responsibility towards copyright violation. But Is there any way to get the source input of the previous version so that I may extract the parts that were authored by me because I spent a lot of time writing those parts and I don't have any backup. I would be really thankful to you if you could provide me with the source code of the previous version.

Thanks So1idSnake

I emailed it to you.--S Philbrick (Talk) 19:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]