User talk:Snowycats/Archives//2021/January
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Snowycats. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! HouseOfChange (talk) 01:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Piramal Realty
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Piramal Realty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 07:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
wikipedia : draft Ypso-Facto / Submission declined - what to do?
Hi Snowycats,
I am trying to submit a description for the company I work for, but it has been declined again. The reason is not adequately supported by reliable sources.
It's a new company, and the products are also new. So I am not sure what reliable sources are required. We have publications though in reognized journal and magazine, like Chemistry Today and Taylor&Francis online (peer reviewed), Chemical Engineering magazine - books published by Cambridge University Press.
I cant' see more relliable sources than scientifc journals here... Can you please help me? Thank you in advance,
Agnes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.49.17.188 (talk) 14:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Declined article about Jan Poleszczuk (?)
I corrected the source description, but I cannot know if it has already been looked at and therefore do not know if it is enough. The article is in many places based on conclusions from the analysis of many sources. In this sense, it is original. Thus, some sentences are not a copy from other sources. KSz at OWPTM KSz at OWPTM (talk) 10:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Pinpoint issues on my article?
Hello! You declined my article for submission due to unreliable sources, yet I know FORBES is a public and reliable source. Same with THE SILICON REVIEW. Can you help me pinpoint the specific issues? I'd be greatly appreciative. That and notability - perhaps Yacoub may not seem notable in the USA, but in Africa, he is very notable and an up and coming person, making changes to the economy of that nation. Advice on what would need to happen to elevate Yacoub to be 'notable'?...more public/published mentions in Magazines? University published? Thank you very much for your kind help in the right direction. Happy to delete/remove anything you feel is wrong so that a minimum version can get approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajtppm (talk • contribs) 15:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)