User talk:Snowswamp

March 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for coordinated single purpose disruptive editing/abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Mfield (talk) 06:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowswamp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm an old editor to this article, and an even old editor to the chinese version of this article with the account "雪围南泽". That's all my accounts

Decline reason:

Well, all you seem to have done since you got here is start an inflammatory edit-war. Mango juice^talk 13:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowswamp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you call someone protecting technical mistakes from my fixing an edit war, and discriminatively blocked me, I'll save my time to any appeal again. ::Technical mistake: the "he/she" character (他) used is actually either the normal "he/she" (for humans) or the one used for inanimate objects or animals. ::Truth: "它" is used for inanimate objects or animals, "他" is used for men, "她" is used for women in simplified chinese. :I'm curious how wiki avoid old users using edit-war as a tool to protect their technical mistakes. :::- Snowswamp (talk) 12:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 14:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snowswamp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block reason is " coordinated single purpose disruptive editing/abusing multiple accounts" , so I presented all my accounts and User:Mangojuice accepted my explanation to the block reason.

So if he wants to accuse me of edit-war, he should unblock my account for multiple accounts and file another charge on edit-war.

So please clarify which kind of block I'm in.

Snowswamp (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a court of law. You've been disruptive on multiple fronts. You failed the WP:Duck test on sockpuppetry and you edit warred. No reason whatsoever to unblock. Toddst1 (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pangear for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mfield (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The funny thing is I need not make myself familiar with notes for the suspect, because I can't even edit the evidence page. Actually I got no chance to defend myself before my verdict.