User talk:Snowolf/Archives/200703
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Snowolf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thanks. Majorly (o rly?) 16:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
UCC
Thanks for the heads-up about the controversy about the Upper Canada College article. These private school boys can get carried away. There were similar problems with the article about St. Michael's College School, which is about half a mile from UCC. John FitzGerald 23:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
NPW userbox
Hi - thanks for making that great userbox :) - I'll be adding to my userbox collection soonish. Thanks again, Martinp23 20:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for the revert and the counter update :-) --Rettetast 23:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Snowbot
Any chance you can tell Snowbot to clear out some user cats I deleted? That's a lot easier than going on AWB and removing the members :) VegaDark 02:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, I've just been unblocked so I can tell my bot to deal with that. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 13:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a ton...and WTF, you were blocked? Glad to see that is resolved now. If you could have your bot check for empty user cats like this once or twice a week that would be great, I'll make sure to first remove the cats from any templates I see though. VegaDark 20:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Entrusted with the Bucket!
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. Thanks for your vote, I've received an overwhelming 96% support and successfully took a copy of bucket-and-mop from the main office!
School graduation exam and HKCEE are both pressing in, so I might become inactive for a while. But soon after that, I look forward to working with you! --Deryck C. 03:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Your comment on User Talk:Essjay
Hi! I'm sure your recent "worthless contributions" barnstar to Essjay's talk page was well meant, but it struck me as very inappropriate. Would you please reconsider placing it there? Thanks, William Pietri 08:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think you meant 'countless' and mistyped? Might be worth heading back to clarify. All the best, Ben Aveling 09:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ben is totally right. I'm really sorry for the mess. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 12:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've been blocked by Pschemp (one month), but now I've been unblocked by other admins. I've just removed both my unblock requests, but in the history you can find what I had to say on this matter. I wanted to support him in this moment, not to bite him ;-). I think that it should be AGF another time :-(. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 13:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode!
This is a special episode we recored specifically dealing w/ the whole Essjay/Ryan Jordan situation. We recorded this before Jimbo's second comment, so it might be a little dated but still a good listen.
As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 08:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
snowbot
just a heads up, but your bot seems to have renamed Category:Women's Colleges that are Coeducational to simply [[Category:]] when it was supposed to be changed to Category:Former women's universities and colleges in the United States that became coeducational. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keatinga (talk • contribs) 20:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
Thanks!!
Thanks so much for the barnstar, its my second so far even though I've been here since December (had my account since May '06). Again, thank you and I'm going to move it to the barnstar section of my Userpage (if you don't mind!!) Anyway Thanks and happy editing!!!Tellyaddict 11:18, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Of course move it ;-). Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)CONCOI on 11:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks
Nice delete key, that. I'll try to collect the Alt and Ctl keys as well.--Mike Selinker 14:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!!!
Thanks for saying you would support me in any future RFAs, you see the thing is my failed RFA was only two months back so I'd like to leave it for 1-2 months, your comment is greatly appreciated and if you would like to nominate me in the future months I would be overjoyed, thanks again and happy editing.Tellyaddict 17:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Gosh, people have been so nice to me in the past few days. I'm humbled. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 01:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Is there a way to say "I Think This User Is a Sockpuppet But I Don't Know Whose"? That is what I would rather have done. I was kind of freaked out when they asked me to email them privately (because it seemed like they created the account to ask me to do so). And then when they started barking about the Army manual that scared me. I don't want some curette-wielding Marine showing up at my house. Any ideas? Joie de Vivre 23:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I created Xiner's RFA, so you can create a co-nom. Oh, yeah, that reminds me, could you provide a link to Xiner's former RFA in your nom. It slipped my mind. bibliomaniac15 02:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wait! Sorry I wasn't referring to Snowolf, whose offer I have to regrettably decline. I've already had one from a while back, you see. Sorry! I hope you'll still offer your thoughts on it, though. Xiner (talk, email) 02:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Mediation
It seems that after the edit war, one user was blocked for two days and then we could continue discussing again normally without wars, so it seems maybe we don't need a mediator anymore (however, presumably we will need it again... :-( ). Thank you, --Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 05:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
That would be great! Where do we begin?
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
fatty mic fat fat
your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom your mom —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Panzee (talk • contribs) 17:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC).
Robert Baden-Powell vandalism
your rv of an anon IP's vandalism was only partially successful, leaving the Article badly vandalized JGHowes 18:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the case, and sorry for it! I was going to delete the case, but you responded before I had the time to do so. Anyways, thanks! Canadianshoper 00:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Also, the stuff Re-evolution put on my talk page you treated as a personal attack wasn't one. Rather, when he first entered Wikipedia, he thought the talk page was a chat line. (I know re-evolution in person) Canadianshoper 01:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Hooray!
Where do we begin? Bentobias 01:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bentobias (talk • contribs) 01:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC).
Hi,
I am through engaging, Tilman. He has done nothing but badger me and such me into this little squabble of his. I want something done with him. He invokes policy when it suits him
Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 13!
We've decided to avoid the direct link to the audio file in an attempt to prevent any sort of audio format war. You can download whichever version you want (we have OGG, MP3 and AAC on the site.
The direct download to Episode 13 is http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/03/06/wikipedia-weekly-13/
As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 07:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Re: MedCab case
Sure, I'll check it out. Thanks, Khoikhoi 02:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you remove a category?
Why did you remove Category:Dark Shadows cast members? I want a good explanation why you done this??
Shkarter1985 20:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Commment about my RfA
Hi there, I'd like to thank you for earlier this week saying you agree with Retiono Virginian, he has created my nomination and I have accepted it and answered the questions, I'm not advertising my RfA as I know that is discouraged but because you agreed and felt I was ready for the tools, I just thought you may wish to leave your comments on the RfA. Again thanks and happy editing!! Regards - Tellyaddict 21:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Userboxes
That's not what I mean. I know how to transclude, but if I had more than one box on the same page, it would be pretty hard to just use one box. Do you see what I'm saying? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- So I have to keep userboxes on different pages at all times in order to be able to transclude them? Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks for your help! Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Request
Please add a space to your signature; it's stretching the edit window. Then again, simply shortening it would be good too. Picaroon 22:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
The entire section was overrun, and the links were incorrect. I don't suggest reverting that section back to the original state, but if you think so go ahead.
Wolf's Rain
Wow. Snowolf you are quick. I was just writing something on the talk page as we speak. The section definitely needs editing. You have to read into the spoilers section to be able to get a good overview of the story. In addition, the last couple of paragraphs are more like a rant or someone's theories behind the plot, which is for a forum discussion. Maybe I went about this the wrong way but I am somewhat new to the whole editing thing (for the most part I just try to suggest things in the talk pages of established pages) but this was just begging for some improvements.--88wolfmaster 23:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I wasn't trying to make anything serious of it. It just looked annoying, and it would be better to remove it. Thanks for the response, I do appreciate it.
malfunction
Hi, the bot seems to be malfunction, it is deleting category instead of renaming as per the edit summary. E.g [1]. Cheers.--Vsion 00:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, you're totally right, unfortunately. Uman error, of course. This evening, when I'll be back at home, I'll fix the previously done damage. Right now, I fixed the code so the program can work. Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 14:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry if this has already been discussed, but your signature is exceedingly long in wikimarkup and I found it very disruptive following a diff because of it. Please can you try and reduce the overhead somehow? --Spartaz Humbug! 20:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Shortened. Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 22:39, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
MedCab cases
Hi, I am concerned that you are taking on a lot of MedCab cases. I would recommend that you try to concentrate on a few cases, for example Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-06 Steven Alan Hassan has had some heated discussion during the last three days which you should try to moderate. --Ideogram 05:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- As clearly stated in my user page and on this talk page, I was moving my pc from one house to another. I'm now back. I don't think I have problems in handling multiple cases at the same time, simply I wasn't on the pc, in this days, for what I've said. Now I'm back and I'll begin moderation. However, I now see that I have to drop the case to which you were referring because of my strict COI policy. I've got issues with Mr. Introvigne, and I've decided to retire from that mediation. Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 22:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Adoption
Hiya, I'm rather new to Wikipedia and I'm still trying to get a hang of things and would like someone to help me along the way. I was wondering if you would be interested in adopting me? Thanks!SyBerWoLff 21:15, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Awesome, Thank you :D SyBerWoLff 21:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
My edits
I did edit a couple of things that were unhelpful but one of my edits to Wayne Rooney's personal life was perfectly fine and I would appreciate if you would put it back on, it would mean a lot to me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.232.101.238 (talk) 21:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC).
?
Why did you write a message to Cremepuff222 to me? What userbox? Chiefsfan364 (talk) 00:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Complaint
I don't like it when you remove my category I concieved. Category:Dark Shadows castmembers. (formerly Category: Dark Shadows actors) What right did you remove my category. I'm a shame of you. Shkarter1985 04:00, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Thank you for your support in my my recent RfA in which I withdrew because the oppose votes were almost equalling the supporters. I then decided to leave my account (Tellyaddict) and start fresh under a new username, however I quickly decided to reconsider after another user persuaded me not to leave the account - I am now glad I did reconsider because leaving that account and creating a new one was too hasty so I've decided to improve rather than starting again! I hope we can remain civil and that there were no negative feelings caused. Again, thanks for your support even though I withdrew it, your vote is much appreciated! Regards - Tellyaddict (Talk) 19:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
- Thanks for the quick reply, I will be waiting quite a while until I feel ready and I will do the best I can to solve the problems and comments which were made. Again - Thanks!! Regards - Tellyaddict (Talk) 19:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Error in NPWatcher
The application failed to initialize properly (0xc000135). Click on OK to terminate the application. is what I get when I try to run it. Any help? ?_? RedSkunktalk 03:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Snowbot
Hi,
I would like to request a edit rate change for my bot, Snowbot. Can you please tell me what it the procedure for such a thing?
Thanks and happy editing,
Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 00:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- No formal procedure. :-) What edit rate do you want? —METS501 (talk) 01:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Something like 7-10, I don't know how much exactly. Simply the currently rate of 5/min is slow, since CFD/W is really long many times. And even UCFD, sometimes. You're more expert than me, and you surely know better than me what is the rate that Snowbot need, I think ;-) Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 10:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, there's no problem with 7-10 edits/min. Approved. :-) —METS501 (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Something like 7-10, I don't know how much exactly. Simply the currently rate of 5/min is slow, since CFD/W is really long many times. And even UCFD, sometimes. You're more expert than me, and you surely know better than me what is the rate that Snowbot need, I think ;-) Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 10:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Possible snowbot malfunction
A category was renamed per this discussion, however the bot didn't edit the template properly. I had to perform this edit to fix everything, thought I'd mention it to be on the safe side. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 17:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Technical problem
I keep getting the "you have new messages" message every time I open a new page, but every time I look, it's your comment that I already responded to on the D&C talk page. Do you know why this is happening? Joie de Vivre 18:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 14!
The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 14 is at http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/03/11/wikipedia-weekly-14/
The OGG version is here The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here
In this edition
* We wrap up the Essjay affair, as the famous Wikipedian cuts ties to the online encyclopedia. * A look at the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year Competition, which finished earlier this week. In addition, all the Featured Pictures of 2006 are available as a bittorrent download. * The new “Username Usurpation” feature at the English Wikipedia. * Jimmy Wales travels to India for the recent Indian WikiCamp, and narrowly survives an attack of ninja monkeys. * One thousand Featured Articles at the German Wikipedia. * 300 Spartans.
As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 19:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Ahh, I thought I fixed the template..... -- Tawker 20:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Real World/Road Rules Challenge: The Inferno III edit
I was only trying to re-type the page because it is all messed up and out of order. The page needs work and it always gets reverted as I'm in the process of fixing it.(Pepsiman785 02:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC))
Adoption
Thanks for your offer, sorry i was not able to reply quickly but was without the net for a few days. If the offer still stands i would like to be adopted on wikipedia by you. Crested Penguin 09:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Che belle conoscenze che si fanno
Ho gia' scritto ad AmiDaniel, male che vada mi copio il tool e lo modifico io. Per il tool delle pagine nuove si puo' fare, serve solo un po' di tempo. --Jalo 15:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Tagging With SnowBot
Can you run the SnowBot to tag every articles in the category and sub-categoriesCategory:Protected areas of India with the tag {{WP India|protected-areas=yes|protected-areas-importance=|class=|importance=}} . It is very much important for running the wikiproject. Pls. do it quickly. Amartyabag TALK2ME 06:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Tasks
Since you have adopted me on wikipedia are there any tasks you would like me to do? Always willing to learn Crested Penguin 08:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi Snowolf. Thank you for participating in my RfA. You keep contributing to UCfD, ok? Rest assured that I heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Please don't hesitate to give me constructive criticism anytime. Xiner (talk, email) 03:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Wikipedia Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 15!
The link to all versions of Wikipedia Weekly 14 is at [2]
The OGG version is here The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here
In this edition
This episode sees Liam, more commonly known as Witty Lama, catching up with Rama’s Arrow and Ragib to talk about contributing to Wikipedia from and Indian and Bangladeshi perspective. Topics include their growing collection of Featured Articles, the success of the Indian WikiProject, and the problem of Internet access on the Subcontinent.
As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!
Please spread the word about Wikipedia Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
For Tawker and the rest of the Wikipedia Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 23:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to receive such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Adoptee
hiyas, i was wondering if you are willing to adopt me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hinatachan4ever (talk • contribs) 18:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC).
Glengordon01
I would like to report Glengordon01 for his use of personal attacks and deleting others' commentary. Would you join up with it so I am not the lone claimant? --Scottandrewhutchins 20:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
XfD Barnstar
Thank you : ) - jc37 09:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
I have just started a article with the title mentioned above. Perhaps it would be interesting contributing\starting with me to this list; it might be fun if their is some kind of a competition between several users, to be on top of that list! Maybe some people would go and work harder, do more, contribute more, and vandalise less! Not take it 'too seriously; its just for fun, and feel free to add yourself to the list! So, what do you say?
the Old and respectable Kashwialariski 16:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
RfA nomination
- Aww, and I was hoping for a beat-the-nom support too. :( VegaDark 22:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
^demon RfA
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/^demon 2. You added your support to the oppose column [3]. Prob best if you fix it so its unambiguously clear which way you're voting. WjBscribe 22:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
User cats
If you could run this to delete users out of user categories again that would be great, all the 0-level categories were deleted and I'm pretty sure there are lots of people that still need to be removed, also Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro needs to be cleared out again as someone recreated it, among others. Thanks, VegaDark 20:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, I know I removed the category out of the template for every one I deleted, but that was only about 1/5 of the categories listed in that nom. VegaDark 22:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Can snowbot remove parent categories from subcategories as well? Category:Unofficial Wikipedian categories could use clearing out if so :). Thanks, VegaDark 02:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Barnstar
Thanks, I'll try to keep at it :-) ^demon[omg plz] 00:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support on my Request for Administration
I'm happy to say that thanks in part to your support, my RfA passed with a unanimous score of 40/0/0. I solemnly swear to use these shiny new tools with honour and insanity integrity. --Wafulz 15:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Stub-sorting script
Did you make any progress with that idea? If you have even a "rough draft", I'd be very interesting in having a look at it... Alai 16:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Please don't mark your edits as minor
Adding a WikiProject template to a talk page (some of which are actually new pages) is not a minor edit. Please turn "minor" off. Thanks. --kingboyk 16:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC) (WP:BAG)
Snowbot gone awry?
Greetings. I saw a number of changes made by User:Snowbot today that seem to be a substitution gone awry. Specifically, lots of hockey players from Ontario have been recategorized into Category:Ice hockey personnel from Yukon. No clue where exactly this goes to get fixed, though, but since you own the bot, you seemed the first line of action. Thank you, —C.Fred (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've blocked the bot for 24 hours. Can you fix this and let me know when you want me to unblock it ? Thanks. -- No Guru 19:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon[omg plz] 20:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Blockage
I've had to block this bot as it is moving a series of hockey players into inappropriate categories.[4] -- No Guru 19:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Issue resolved. Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 21:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar. It's always nice to see that one's work is appreciated, especially when it isn't the most glamorous job around! Raven4x4x 09:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Userpage revert
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. —Ocatecir Talk 10:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- And thank you for the barnstar :) Happy editing (and vandal fighting). —Ocatecir Talk 10:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
re:barnstar
Hey thanks! I'm pleased not to have made any mistakes so far as an admin, appreciate you noticing :D cheer Snowolf SGGH 11:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Bad reversion
Hi.
Looks like your bot/script caught a race condition and reverted my rvv of "HI MOM' from Polyester. It was this edit link. I'm going to revert your reversion since it seems obviously wrong. Hope that's ok. jhawkinson 12:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, did you remove my paragraph on Kenny Rogers and the Mets? If so, why?
Thanks
thanks for removing vandalisum from my page I didnt notice till now :P ♥Eternal Pink-Ready to fight for love and grace♥ 18:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar!
Thanks for awarding me my first barnstar! Like you, I use Lupin's anti vandal tool, and have become pretty proficient at it. Keep up the good work with everything you do, Danski14(talk) 22:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Not exactly sure how to best respond as I'm not fully familiar with all of Wiki's features, but the content I removed from depersonalization page was badly spelled, inaccurate (it presented itself as fact with no source and was only an opinion). Also, it's format messed up the page and appeared as only one long line of text. I believe the text was an act of vandalism, not my removal of it. Thanks.
False Reversion
Your bot's reversion on Canterbury High School was faulty. The sections in question that were deleted were quite noticeably un-noteworthy and opinion-based. Bots aren't able to pick out stories because they mention "kids getting wedgies" (i.e. something completely irrelevant to a school's wiki page.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.101.97.67 (talk) 06:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC).
Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Wrong person
I'm assuming that other people have the same ip address as me, but I did not vandalize the Chromosome page!!! This is so insulting.
Testdummy 12:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
More snowbot tasks
Any way Snowbot can periodically depopulate Category:Wikipedians per this UCFD? There are also several more user categories that are being discussed right now that look like they will need to be depopulated as well. Thanks, VegaDark 07:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- No, subcategories should not be removed, only user pages directly in the category. Is there any way you can tell snowbot to not remove the category from pages in the category namespace? VegaDark 20:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)