User talk:SnotRod007

Welcome!

Hello, SnotRod007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Клоун 13:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Starscream clones

Derick J. Wyatt specifically said that FSC is based on Overlord's design. Stop removing that link.

As for Skywarp - there has been NO official confirmation that this is the character's name. Only Thundercracker has been officially confirmed.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 14:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to List of robots in Transformers: Animated‎. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained why the page is named like that. I assume you want to name the Coward Starscream Skywarp because a Skywarp toy will soon be released. However, there is no reliable or verifiable confirmation that this character is the character from the show.

As for Female Starscream Clone:

"However, when contacted about it, Derrick Wyatt revealed that her color scheme was actually "loosely inspired" by the Japanese Godmaster Overlord. Unexpected! Still, half of Overlord was technically female... "

I have repeatedly explained this in my reversions, while you have done nothing to contribute to discussion. This type of editing is considered vandalism, and can get you temporarily blocked or even banned. I suggest that you don't continue with it.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for finally engaging in discussion. Unfortunately, information from stolen items and the people who stole them is not considered reliable. While I agree that Coward Starscream will almost certainly eventually be revealed to be named Skywarp, Wikipedia depends on reliable sources, and the ability to verify them by independent sources, which the stolen item would have neither of.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 14:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just ask, why? The Skywarp toy has not been officially released, and there is no way to confirm that it is who those who are illegally selling and buying the toy say it is. Meanwhile, the author has officially confirmed that FemScream is based off of Overlord, and this is reliable (coming from the show author), and verifiable (you can even ask him on his blog, and he'll say it again).

Seriously, when the toy or official box images are officially released, we can and almost certainly will put "Skywarp" back in. However, as of now, it does not fulfill the requirements for verifiability and reliability, which are absolute bedrock principles for wikipedia.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I even went to the site that all the others claim to be getting the bio from, and it has no pictures of the bio. Just of the front of the box, a picture we already had. I was willing to compromise when you claimed that there was a picture, just from an illegitimate source, but if you don't even have that? No. These sites have a ridiculously huge record of mistaken news to be given that much credit - they even admit it for most stories (like Jetfire being a Decepticon for the movie).Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 00:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, apparently, you even work on what used to be the Transformers wiki, so you know damn well what counts for verifiable and reliable sources, and you're simply doing this to be a prat. Seriously, please stop - if you must do this, keep it on the Transformers wikia, but if you keep doing it on 'pedia, I will file a vandalism report on you.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 11:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

....I've told you over and over that, not only are your edits violations of WP:R (which isn't optional), but WP:V, as the "pictures" aren't actually there. I'm not arguing that the character is almost certainly named Skywarp - I'm explaining that we are not allowed to post speculation. AT ALL. This is one of the bedrock policies of the wiki that we are not allowed to violate for any reason. IF an edit is contested, as this one has been, over and over, THE MANDATORY POLICY IS THAT YOU MUST PROVIDE A SOURCE FOR YOUR EDIT. You have repeatedly failed and refused to do so, even when I tried to be helpful and do the work for you. You have done nothing but trolling and vandalism, as they are defined - a complete refusal to work within the non-negotiable policies of this project.

THIS is what I've been talking about the entire time: this is the alleged "back of the box verification". THERE'S NOTHING THERE. I know for a fact that either you were too lazy to actually look for verification, or you saw this same damn image. YOU HAVE NEVER SEEN HIS ACTUAL BIO. You have only ever seen what fansites claim is his bio. They may even be right, but you have no way of checking. That is called "verification", and you have completely refused to do it. It's NOT optional.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 13:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to List of robots in Transformers: Animated‎. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the site that all the others, including TFW, claim to be sourcing their article from. As you can clearly see, the image is not actually there. Even opening up the page code to track down the image link leads you to an empty page. As this is the source for the "story", and it provides no verification, I can guarantee 100% that you don't know what the hell you're blathering about. There's no polite way to say it: you're being a moron, and you need to stop. It's only going to get you blocked, and I've given you more than your fair share of chances.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 03:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dropkick (Transformers)

The article Dropkick (Transformers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources with which to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Payload (Transformers) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Payload (Transformers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Payload (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 13:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]