User talk:Snob

Welcome!

Hello Snob, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! feydey 17:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.feydey 17:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sissy

Please stop adding that picture. This article does not need a picture. Jasmol

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jasmol 07:21, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jasmol 07:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Chonsekmanng.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chonsekmanng.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 19:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Betty chan

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 23:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fine if you are going to delete every single new post about people you don't know,,,, You should really do some research, and read my comments on the betty chan talk page, i gave you all the links and you havnt even clicked on one!,,

As far as I can see, it does not meet the guidelines set down in WP:BIO. If you dispute this, please take up the issue on the deletion review page. --InShaneee 01:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That depends. Please read the guideines at WP:BIO and make sure that this person meets one or more of the criteria there first. --InShaneee 01:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that that qualifies as wide enough notibility, but the page to request its undeletion is Wikipedia:Deletion review, if you would still like to try. --InShaneee 01:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! If you're looking for the discussion that's being held over this article, please see Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Betty_chan. I moved it to the proper place for you. If you'd like to understand some of the important policies Wikipedia editors use to try to determine whether a page on a person will make an acceptable encyclopedic entry, see Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Notability (people). You may also like to read Wikipedia:Guide to deletion, which explains the process of article deletion and restoration on Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask at the Deletion review link above, and editors will be glad to help you. Regards —Encephalon 06:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Chan and it's talk page, Before you delete my post you should look at the links i provided, I gave you proof the betty chan exists and her name is even on the yew chung website, Look at the tuitition fee,1666 us dollars per month ( the hong kong yew chung).. It is a very prestigious school in hong kong and that school exists.. search yew chung international school in wikipedia.... I said her husband is the secretary of the former cheif excetive tung chee wah and you think i am lying... have to clicked onto the PIS website, the new yew chung international school campus that will be built in kowloon tong? READ!! it is the first school in hong kong to be granted land from the government to build a private school.... Her husband's chinese name YIP KWOK WAH.... did you click on my google search link? did you? please do not delete every single post about people you don't know please? you thought she don't exist and you didnt even click onto my links.. and now you think you are working for wikipedia and doing a great job!Snob 00:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You can use a Sandbox in order to develop your articles before publishing. The article as-deleted did not assert the notability of the subject and qualified for speedy deletion under {{db-bio}}, referring to WP:BIO. If the article is developed with evidence for notability placed on the page proper before publication, then it could be accepted as a perfectly valid candidate for WP. If the article was to have additional information placed on to the page immediately, rather than a simple repost of already-deleted material - something that is characteristic of vandals - then you can use a hangon tag, which you can find on the Wikipedia:Template_messages/Maintenance Template pages. Regards, (aeropagitica) 10:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Perhaps you intend those comments for another administrator, as I've had no involvement in the deletion of the Betty chan page you created. Regardless, I do urge you to consider sharing your views at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Betty_chan, which is where the matter is being discussed, and to read the pages I linked above, as they pertain closely to the issues. Regards —Encephalon 17:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thx for the adviceSnob 23:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Chan

Since you are the administrator you should really look at my comments from the talk page. I see no reasons for (aeropagitica) to delete my " betty chan" post since I have all the proof the she exists and i am a former Yew chung student, I even posted the links.. although the 120 million us dollar fortune of hers might seem to be fake, I said " believed " She is close with some of our chinese teachers and they told us while we were talking about her.. as for the address "http://www.hkt.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=PCCW%2FPCCWHK%2FCustomerSupport%2FDirectories%2FWhitePagesPost&cid=993198475060&pagelang=eng&Address=&Directory=R&Lang=A&ExpandDistrict=Y&KeywordSearch=&organ=&dept=&f_name=chan&g_name=+betty+po+king&perArea=ALL&perDist=&biz_name=&bizArea=&bizDist="... Look at the tuitition fee from the Yew Chung webpage and times it by the number of students and schools. Thank you very much, I am looking forward for your reply

Hi there, in future please use ~~~~ to sign your messages.

Talk pages of nonexistent pages can automatically be deleted. If you feel a page should not have been deleted, please list it on WP:DRV. Thanks. Stifle 23:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have already listed on that discussion page.. but i have recieved no replies..Can you tell me what to do next? I need to post that page back up...=[ do wikipedia keep backups of those pages which are

deleted? thanks Snob 00:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you post the page back up it will automatically qualify for deletion, and may quite possibly end up like this, which would not be very helpful to you. Therefore you must wait until the deletion review debate resolves.

All deleted pages are indeed kept as backup for Wikipedia where needed, so if the debate determines a consensus that your article should be restored, there will be no problem whatsoever doing so. Stifle 11:27, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Em, I hav completed about 80% of the " betty chan" bio.. and I posted it both on the talk page and the deletion page......how does it work and is it possible that the bio will be reposted? Snob 08:04, 1 April 2006 (UTC) thx[reply]

In about four days' time, an administrator will check to see if there is consensus for the page to be restored. (There won't be, unless something very strange happens.) Stifle 20:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"(There won't be, unless something very strange happens.)" you mean there won't be a possibility that the "betty chan" post will be reposted? Snob 23:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. The consensus so far is that six users think it should not be reposted, and one thinks it should. Stifle 23:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Betty chan.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Betty chan.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 13:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Efff130c.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Efff130c.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 13:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DCP 0507.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DCP 0507.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 13:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]