User talk:Snakese

Welcome!

Hello, Snakese, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Yes, that user name is appropriate. Neil ☎ 12:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nigger, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Granf 19:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your name came up in affiliation with unconstructive edits. If there has been some mistake, i apologize.

Twinkle is not foolproof, obviously. Helps to see what it actually throws up. --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 19:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Twas not a bad revert. I changed the page back from "Blair Bitch Project" into "Blair Witch Project". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Granf (talk • contribs) 19:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nyttend RfA

It wasn't a real oppose. On the other hand... I think I'm the only RfA you've ever supported. I'm fascinated as to why this is, and want to know who you really are, but alas, I don't think you'll be revealing that anytime soon... east.718 at 22:18, 11/1/2007

Ack, didn't see your second message before replying. This is one of the most qualified candidates to come through in months and surely will be a runaway success... besides, surely nobody would think that 24k mainspace edits is too few. east.718 at 22:19, 11/1/2007

Just dropping by...

Hey, Snakese. Just popping in to see how you're finding Wikipedia, in your new account :) hopefully you're enjoying the whole article-writing process? If you're looking to collaborate with Wikipedians who enjoy your interests, you might want to think about joining a WikiProject. These are simply informal groups of users who each share a common interest - e.g., if you're interested in the C++ programming language, then Wikipedia:WikiProject C++ would be relevant to you. There's no limit to then number of WikiProjects you can join - enrol in as little or as many as you want. You can also leave at any time, and you decide to what extent you want to get involved in them.

There's also some tasks to do (if you're bored :-) at {{to-do}}. If you've got any questions about Wikipedia, don't hesitate to get in touch. Again, enjoy Wikipedia!

Kind regards,
Anthøny 17:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		My RFA
		Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718 at 02:30, 11/4/2007

Re:LauraLove RfA

This comment diff was completely uncalled for and is, in my opinion, a blatant personal attack. If you continue to attack other users in this manner I will not hesitate to block you. Tim Vickers

Your attempts at self-justification are unconvincing. An apology would be more appropriate. Tim Vickers 21:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment in opposition to a user's request for adminship based on her sex and marital status was not acceptable. Please do not make similar comments at any time in the future. Newyorkbrad 21:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I'll happily support any block Tim places on your account. I would also strongly suggest that you remove the comment you made on LaraLove's RfA. Nick 21:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise - Alison ^❤ 22:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. Playing the "bad mother" card on her was perhaps the single-most disgusting and tacky move anyone's made on ANY RFA. And I've been here for three and a half years. So, good job. Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 00:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snakese (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i don't know why i've been blocked as the blocking admin didn't even tell me

Decline reason:

you have been confirmed as a sockpuppet _→AzaToth 12:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Snakese (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not break any sockpuppet policies

Decline reason:

If you want to be unblocked, please request an unblock on your original account, not this one. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sock puppetry

This account has engaged in sock puppetry. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/The Negotiator for evidence. Jehochman ^Talk 20:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]