User talk:Snakelumps123

Snakelumps123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Snakelumps123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision to Platinum article

The edit I reverted was dated 19:00, 9 November 2015‎; also done without any clearly stated rationale. Dan56 (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Platinum (Miranda Lambert album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 21:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Every single one of my edits were justified by references to WP guidelines and clear-cut reasoning. For you to undo everything like this is completely unfair and amateurish. I offered substantial explanations for each changes and even started a discussion at the talk page to give you a chance to not turn this into an edit war. I demand the same courtesy. My changes are justified. The burden is on you to justify your undoing them. Dan56 (talk) 21:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

you can accuse me of being disruptive all you want. When it comes right down to it, you are the one reverting the page back 7 months regardless of how many times it's been undone or explained.Snakelumps123 (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

It hasn't been explained, I'm not reverting the entire page back to 7 months, and you're refusing to explain it or engage in any discussion about what objections you have specifically and why, which is not the best move for you. There's an RfC at the article's talk page open. I strongly suggest you direct your subsequent efforts there rather than restoring your preferred version of the article. Dan56 (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

You are a troll and I am not taking your bait. You made an edit and it was undone. You made it again, it was undone. Instead of trying something different, you poked the bear by doing it again. Snakelumps123 (talk) 03:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please stop attacking other contributors, as you did on this edit to Skid Row (American band). If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Which is funny. Are you sending Dan56 a warning for stalking me?

but, yes, you are correct. I shouldn't stoop to his level. Snakelumps123 (talk) 04:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Skid Row (American band). Mlpearc (open channel) 04:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

again, talk to dan56. He is instigating, I am simply undoing his childish behavior.Snakelumps123 (talk) 04:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

This might interest you @Mlpearc:, @Jim1138:. Dan56 (talk) 04:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

why would your childish behavior be of interest to them. You're proving my point. You are upset about me undoing your edit, and now you are stalking me. Snakelumps123 (talk) 04:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Skid Row

Why did you revert the copyediting I did to Skid Row? The 1144 bytes of text removed are simply because the prose was verbose and I cleaned that up. I also reduced the inconsistency about whether the band is referred to in singular or plural. Your explanation that the grammar was alright as previously written is nonsense.--Retrohead (talk) 09:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

@Retrohead:, this user has been blocked as a sock of a past vandal, who's edited Skid Row under different names throughout this year (evidence here). Be mindful as the next disruptive editor who makes similar changes to that article may very well be another incarnation of the sock master. Dan56 (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)