User talk:SmoothWallsSam

Hi SmoothWallsSam, thank you for your edits, however the ones made to David Tweed and Conficker are somewhat too partisan for Wikipedia. While we welcome you aboard, it might be worthwhile reviewing Wikipedia in brief, as this gives a good overview of what Wikipedia is and is not. - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 07:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Tweed has received nothing but condemnation and legal challenges in Australia in relation to his "business" of tricking people into selling their shares. His "business" preys on the elderly and people from non-English speaking backgrounds, who receive his unsolicited official-looking letters and are unable to understand the implications. To refer to him as a "businessman", is gross distortion and does not represent a neutral POV.SmoothWallsSam (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unsecretspy for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. NJA (t/c) 13:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]