User talk:Smmtt
Smartmatic
[edit]Please stop adding links to the Smartmatic website to articles. See WP:LINKSPAM for more details. Thanks, Number 57 14:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smmtt, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SmartSE (talk) 12:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Smmtt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Bbb23 (talk) The reasons to block an account or place it under review should apply equally for everyone, ZiaLater (talk) has insisted since October 23, 2016 on editing over and over again the Smartmatic article, claiming that is based on the consensus of "many verifiable and reliable sources" without sharing with the Wikipedia Community these sources or the links of such content.
This case has been discussed previously, because the action of ZiaLater (talk) could also be described as a single-purpose user, creating and sharing false content to obey other interests outside the Wikipedia Community.
In Smartmatic's talk, ZiaLater (talk) false claims were answered, proving with legal and official documents that the editions he has been doing are only based on mere conjectures and unverifiable sources.
Best,
Decline reason:
You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts; you will need to address that, and only that, in any unblock request. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 20:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.