User talk:Smjeanbaptiste/sandbox

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
Date of review	5/14/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Smjeanbabtiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbabtiste
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor
Good length.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar.
Other comments	Good job! Keronica Grant (talk) 05:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Ant_N_York
Date of review	5/15/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Smjeanbabtiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbabtiste
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Seems very wordly but good information.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good.
Grammar & composition	Good.
Other comments	Good job!

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Smjeanbabtiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbabtiste
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Can be a little shorter.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	No noticeable mistakes. Good grammar.
Other comments	A lot of good information, good job!

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:MsNika349
Date of review	5/7/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: SmJeanBaptiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbaptiste
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/7/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/7/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length. Maybe a few less sentences.
Image (needed/appropriate)	n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	N/a because Edit was from an online article.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to Psych in general.
Wikiformatting	Great formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar/ composition. No mistakes noticed.
Other comments	Altogether, good information provided for the edit.

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Azahur
Date of review	5/7/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: SmJeanBaptiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbaptiste
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate)	n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Yes
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar/ composition. No mistakes
Other comments	a good article and good edit

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey
Date of review	5/15/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Smjeanbabtiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbabtiste
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	The length of the edit is Good.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Textbook information is accurately edited.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	The information presented relates to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Formatting is good.
Grammar & composition	Grammar and composition is good.
Other comments	Good job! [[Joan Bailey (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Mtrowers
Date of review	5/15/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Smjeanbabtiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbabtiste
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	A little lengthy.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Very Accurate!
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych!
Wikiformatting	Great Formatting !
Grammar & composition	No noticeable mistakes. Nice grammar.
Other comments	Plenty of information, good job!

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Nikicia
Date of review	May 16, 2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Smjeanbabtiste
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smjeanbaptiste/sandbox#Diagnosis
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	May 16, 2013
Date review submitted to instructor	May 16, 2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Information is good, but edit may be a bit too long
Image (needed/appropriate)	appropriate image
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate
Wikiformatting	Good job
Grammar & composition	Did not see any errors
Other comments	Great effortNikicia (talk) 04:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]