User talk:Smithbrenon

Welcome!

Hello, Smithbrenon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! howch e ng {chat} 23:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heart Mountain

Thanks for the link. I expanded the article with the new findings. Neat stuff! howch e ng {chat} 23:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

URLs

Hi Smithbrenon. I see you've been adding URLs to numerous pages, all containing information from popular science sites that could be potentially notable. Wouldn't you prefer to actually write something original on these subjects? On blood vessel, the concept of artificial blood vessels is quite notable - why bury it in the external links section? JFW | T@lk 18:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I you don't mind, would you consider posting them on the talkpage, with a short description? This leads to less clutter in the external links section. JFW | T@lk 07:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't you agree that the talk page would be a better place to introduce new ideas & to let other writers take them further? JFW | T@lk 23:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS

Thanks for adding that external link to Galapagos Land Iguana, it's tough finding quality links that aren't to tourism sites or( in the case of other reptiles) dealers.--Mike Searson 17:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Good cause

A tag has been placed on Good cause requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. michfan2123 (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Good cause

I have nominated Good cause, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good cause. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Keilana^talk_(recall) 19:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your new link on Glyptapanteles

Thank you very much for helping out! However, the news article you linked is already listed as a reference in the reference list. Is also listing it in external links redundant? This isn't me just trying to coyly suggest it IS redundant. I honestly don't know if it's appropriate to list it in both or not. - Vianello (talk) 18:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Aquastor

I have nominated Aquastor, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquastor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dougweller (talk) 10:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Molecular computational identification for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molecular computational identification is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molecular computational identification until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]