User talk:Smith'sFistUpGoldman'sMuppet

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to this free encyclopedia. However, your addition to Austrian business cycle theory has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 03:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Smith'sFistUpGoldman'sMuppet, is unduly confrontational.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

-- The Anome (talk) 13:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smith'sFistUpGoldman'sMuppet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason given is ridiculous. A muppet needs a fist up it in order for it to work. It is in no way confrontational. I am not saying 'killBill' or 'smackmydogup' or anything like that. What could possibly be wrong with this username? NOTE: Most of the usernames I wanted (bob123, etc) have already been taken or are too similar to other existing names. What name do you suggest?

Decline reason:

It might be the Smith and the Goldman bit... You could call yourself Ethelbert Crange or Herbert the Barbarian - probably neither already taken. Peridon (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smith'sFistUpGoldman'sMuppet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your use of the term "might be..." shows just how ambiguous the whole thing is. You don't even really know why it's blocked yourself. How about this - we agree to unblock and I won't edit anything on the Goldman Sachs page so there's absolutely no suggestion of a connection. Fair? In a couple of weeks no one will get the connection and then we can live happily ever after...

Decline reason:

Sorry, no. Pick something else. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smith'sFistUpGoldman'sMuppet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The sense of guilt and regret is overwhelming so I have to admit that I am a sockpuppet of Karmaisking and have had my own fist up this sockpuppet for some time. Sincere apologies. No doubt LK has been looking for me.

Decline reason:

How remarkably uninteresting, please go play somewhere else Jac16888 ^Talk 23:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.