User talk:Smileywebmonkey

Duplicate Image:St leonards sea.JPG

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:St leonards sea.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:St leonards sea.JPG is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:St leonards sea.JPG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:St leonards on sea 2.jpg

I'm afraid that images tagged for "non-commercial use only" are not permitted as images on wikipedia, wikipedia content should ideally be in the public domain, GFDL or fair use. If your ead WP:IMAGE and WP:COPYRIGHT they should help. SGGH ^speak! 17:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

Image copyright problem with Image:St leonards on sea 2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:St leonards on sea 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. rossb (talk) 22:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:St leonards on sea.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:St leonards on sea.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. rossb (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wilson bakery kings road.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Wilson bakery kings road.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. rossb (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Mazzer's photos

Bob Mazzer's photo of St Leonards is very striking, and I think it adds to the look of the page. But you haven't provided a copyright tag - see W:Image_copyright_tags stating the licence under which it's contributed to Wikipedia. This is an absolute requirement for images used on Wikipedia. If you have the copyright owner's permission to use it, please add a suitable tag. --rossb (talk)

Hello

Hi. Are you a Norwich City fan? --Dweller (talk) 21:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it. And don't be miffed at The Rambling Man - he's a good guy (for a Binman), trying to do the right thing in as pleasant a way as possible. NB You might like to add {{User:UBX/NCFC}} to your (currently empty) user page! --Dweller (talk) 14:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... I see you've not been welcomed:

Welcome!

Hello, Smileywebmonkey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Dweller (talk) 14:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NCFC fans

Welcome to the club! You probably wouldn't believe it, but NCFC has one of the strongest presences on Wikipedia (in terms of top-quality material) of any football club. Ipswich and Gillingham both have Featured Topics and we're on the way towards getting one too. The main article (Norwich City F.C.) is a Featured Article and you can see some others that are either at or on the way to Featured status listed at my to-do list: User:Dweller/Featured. Currently, I'm working with The Rambling Man on bringing History of Norwich City F.C. up to scratch. The demands of Featured status are tough - you can find information about it by clicking through links at WP:FA. Once you've got your head round it, please do help out! --Dweller (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:St leonards on sea.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:St leonards on sea.jpg, which you've attributed to St Leonards on Sea (author) & Bob Mazzer (source). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Norfolk broads 1.jpg

The file File:Norfolk broads 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Elbasan across valley.jpg

The file File:Elbasan across valley.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]