Jump to content

User talk:Smileykaye

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2022

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Smileykaye. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Lakeview Academy, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Smileykaye. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Smileykaye|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

I wonder if instead of trying to whitewash your school's history, what would happen if you instead embraced it, talked about your roots and where you've come from, and where you'd like to go. You could tell us about Reno Earls, and other early black students, the struggles they faced and the encouragement they received. Wouldn't it be a lot easier than trying to censor and cover up things? Isn't truth and a positive direction better than trying to pretend history didn't happen? Work with us, and we can make the article much better. Try to censor it, and eventually the truth will out. Jacona (talk) 00:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion procedure has closed as keep

[edit]

One the other hand, the page is much improved and does not utilize segregation academy, because the phrase could not be sourced. I would suggest that a few nice pictures of the building be taken and uploaded, but that's a mere suggestion. You may find it's much easier to watch and maintenance a page which is well-sourced. We appreciate your acting honorably as a connected editor. If there's anything I can do to help, including helping students learn more about how to contribute meaningfully on Wikipedia, feel free to call on me. I'm sorry the procedure didn't end according to one's wishes, but I find I deal with that constantly, almost like real life. BusterD (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BusterD I thank you for all your efforts and the time in making the article more comprehensive. I think it now shows a more 360 view of the school as I was unable to do. I am fine that the article was not removed as all I wanted was for it to be more encompassing. You have restored my faith in the editing process. Again, thanks to all who contributed to make the article better. I am sure it was a lot of work and those efforts are much appreciated. Smileykaye (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those are very kind words and I'm glad our natural processes (including the deletion process) have had a positive influence on the school article, and about the way you feel about Wikipedia. Being wikipedian means learning how to disagree without being disagreeable, a valuable life-skill. I often find editors I might oppose in one process becoming important allies in the next discussion. As a person quite familiar with your school community, you'll be aware of local sources which we might miss. Place such links on the talk page when you see them. Don't be shy about making improvements in other articles with which you have familiarity. Always willing to help, and I look forward to hearing from you. BusterD (talk) 17:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]