User talk:Smeagain

June 2007

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 16:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advise. I will be sure to sign from now on in. --SmeAgain 08:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Smeagain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

210.193.236.130 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

No article edits, entire contributions are personal attacks/trolling.

Blocking administrator: Rebecca (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I go through a shared ip address, which has meant that i have been blocked a few time now for acts that i have not done. I was blocked for the actions of user:boyleharry, and i can assure you i have no idea who this user is. Is there any chance that i coud have the block lifetd, as i have been a productive contributor to wikipedia? --SmeAgain 08:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HelpMe Template removed. You are taking the right steps for unblocking yourself. - Andrew4010 08:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smeagain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wish to be unblocked as i have been a positive contributor to wikipedia, and have not directly, or even indirectly for that matter, trolled or vandalised anyones page. The ip adress i go through is shared by many users, and i can assure you that i was not user:boyleharry. boyleharry was the user on this ip that was originally blocked, and i was directly blocked after this for unknown reason. I promise to contribute to wikipedia with the best intentions in the future, if you would be so kind as to unblock me. Thankyou.

Decline reason:

We know for sure that you created Louiilouii (talk · contribs) and that this user trolled and vandalised other users' pages and so your claim that you did not indirectly troll or vandalise anyone's page is clearly false. Given this, there's no reason to believe your other claims (including that you will contribute to the wikipedia with the best of intentions) and so I am declining your block. — Yamla 15:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Any chance you could come to a decision as to whether to unblock me or not soon. Vital editing time is being wasted. Thankyou. SmeAgain 11:29, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The administrators are working on a decision. Many users are waiting for an unblock, so you have to wait your turn. Miranda 11:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for you help Miranda.

The block reason given is "Abusing multiple accounts" - given that you have not addressed that in your unblock request I am requesting more information from the blocking administrator MichaelBillington. ---J.S

(T/C/WRE) 14:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is blocked because he created two sockpuppets and harassed me on my userpage as well as other user's userpages, with (ACB). Thus, this user is blocked because one of his socks is currently blocked. Miranda 14:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Smeagain, you will be blocked from editing. Spartan-James 02:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh

This is my own talk page. How can be threatened with being blocked because i edited my own talk page. Seriously, something is wrong with wikipedia management.--SmeAgain 02:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked. Quit abusing the help me template, because this won't help your case. Miranda 02:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]