User talk:Smassaro24

Psychology of Language

Welcome to the Psychology of Language Wikipedia course project. Below are links related to our course that may be helpful to you.

Let me know if you have any questions. --Kechambers (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Topic

Apraxia of speech

Apraxia question

Hi -- I assume your draft is the one at User:Smassaro24/sandbox? I had a look and there are a couple of formatting errors which I can fix for you if you like. E.g. "Effortful trial and error with groping" and the subsequent points could be done as a bullet list. Anyway, to answer your question: technically if you've incorporated the original material in some form in your sandbox there's no harm in simply replacing the existing version with your version. You can just edit the existing article and delete all the text in the edit window, and replace it with the contents of your sandbox. I'd suggest an edit summary such as "Expanded article" or something like that.

Let me know when you make the substitution and I'll do a pass through the article for formatting and so on. It looks like you've been able to add a good deal of reference material, which is great. I hope you're enjoying the class; it's great to have people who understand the topic work on these articles. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message -- I will take a look tomorrow. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi our paths have crossed on the article in question. Due to my own disability my copy editing skills are next to useless, but I can find the research papers you may need to support the contents of both your project, and the Wikipedia article. I have tidied up my earlier post on the article talk page, so that the links are easier to access. Apraxia is on the boundaries of my current area of interest, aphasia, which in turn has indirect links with my own disability auditory processing disorder. dolfrog (talk) 13:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi me again, could you please try to use more secondary (REVIEW) peer reviewed research papers, preferably papers that have a PubMed ID or DOI. This is the preferred type of citation for Wikipedia Medical articles. I have also set up a new sandbox which you may find of interest. dolfrog (talk) 05:07, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Me again, I like some of your last edits, the next step is to replace these Clinical Exchanges with secondary (review) research papers, I do not know if you have noticed but there has also been some editing activity on the Apraxia article dolfrog (talk) 22:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input and suggestions, they have been helpful. I will plan on looking at additional secondary research papers.Smassaro24 (talk) 04:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Education Program Student Survey

Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 07:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]