User talk:Smashleynguyen

I love this piece. It looks like you really put a lot of work into it and I love the individual breakdowns. I also love how all of your paragraphs are concise and to the point. My only suggestion would be to include more Wikipedia and/or external links in the piece. The more information that can be linked to from this page, the better. Great job! Pseaton (talk) 20:46, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great number of references! Good organization and length, too. Only suggestion is that the section titled "Effects of Birth Control" may be broadened to address the British control of goods, and make the language more straight forward. (areimold (talk) 22:40, 25 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

In your lead, double check your yearly dates. I think you may have used a 1983 instead of 1783. Other than that small error, I thought your Wiki page was very well organized and informal. I really liked that you linked certain words or phrases to other pages. I can tell you put a lot of time into this. I also really liked that you directly quoted people from the time, which makes the piece more factual and reliable. Great use of sources too! Smrose788 (talk) 19:23, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You did a very good job setting up your page and making it easy to know what you are reading about. Nice job sitting your sources within the piece as well. You did put 1983 and I assume that that minor typo will be changed. You did a really nice job on this. Mregan5 (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is great stuff right here. The lead section starts out well and is very well supported by the details in the individual sections. Your use of references is great well. I cant really say there are many issues with this piece, besides the "1983" error, something everybody above me reminded you about. Great piece!AJC301 (talk) 12:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The breakdown and organization of your article makes it easy to navigate and read. Also, you use a lot of references which is great! Just as other people have already said, the only extremely minor mistake I found is the "1983" issue. All in all, nice work! Cait.cowan (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious about the logistics of the British occupation. Did they face a lot of rebellious / sabotaging behavior from the Patriots, or was it overall a peaceful occupation? You mention tension, did it ever escalate? (These are just my personal questions, overall I thought the article was really good) Yobolehobo (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]