User talk:Smashingworth

Welcome!

Hello, Smashingworth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Shanel 01:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Federal judicial appointment history

Thanks for your work on the above and the other articles on the judiciary. It is good to have more people keeping these articles updated, I have a feeling that there is going to be a lot of Senate activity in the coming months. I saw you created some judicial biographies too, that has been a long term project of mine (both present and past circuit court judges) but I never seem to get around to creating many. Please do more if you have an interest :-). Let me know if you ever need assistance on anything. Cheers, NoSeptember ^talk 14:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. Happy editing!

This is in reference to you edit comments on Brett Kavanaugh --waffle iron ^talk 03:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An adminstrator has demanded Thomist gain consensus before adding in the material. Please post your thoughts. He has now added conspiracy material to United Airlines Flight 93. C56C 00:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning templates

Please don't remove warning templates from your talk page. --waffle iron ^talk 04:15, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arkansas Project

Thomist is doing is same old tricks at Arkansas Project. C56C 22:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

I found your posting, "Joie's Record of Editing Hypocrisy Reveals True Motives for Crashing This Page", at Talk:Lavenski Smith, to be a bit problematical. I want to express my opinion here rather than on the talk page, because my first concern is that the talk page is becoming more an argument about editor motives and less a discussion of how to improve the article (and reach consensus). My second concern, a lesser one, is to point out to you that Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines states Never address other users in a heading.

I understand that you're frustrated with the other editor, but you need to follow Wikipedia processes. And whatever you can do to ignore motives and focus on content is all to the good if the objective is to improve the article rather than (say) to force another editor to admit to being wrong. John Broughton | Talk 22:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Republican judges

I noticed that the Category you created, "Republican judges", is likely headed for deletion. I understand that categories like this take quite some time to develop and flesh out, yet this particular one appears to be unwelcome at Wikipedia, unless I'm misunderstanding the argument. I hope that you will continue your work here at Wikipedia. However, just so you know, there are also other wikis out there that might very well welcome such a Category project as yours. You might start by looking at Wikia.com, Centiare.com, or PBwiki.com. If you feel that this message is too spammy, you are welcome to delete it from your discussion page. --JossBuckle Swami 03:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Jeromeaholmes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeromeaholmes.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

Smashingworth's repeated deletions on Thomas B. Griffith page

Please stop deleting the fact that Thomas B. Griffith practiced law in Utah for four years without a state license. If a successfully confirmed federal appeals court judge practiced law in Utah for four years without a state license to do so, shouldn't people be allowed to know that? What purpose does it serve to repeatedly delete this fact? According to Wikipedia standards, if we cannot agree on an article, instead of your repeatedly deleting my edits, we should make a good faith attempt to come to an compromise. Here is the paragraph as it stands now:

Griffith also practiced law for four years in Utah without a state license,^[1] failing to seek membership in the Utah bar upon assuming his duties at Brigham Young University. Griffith's defenders point out that it has been the longstanding position of the Utah bar and its then executive director—a position explained by letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee by five past presidents of the Utah bar—that in-house counsel in Utah need not be licensed there provided they are closely associated with local counsel, a practice Griffith carefully followed during his tenure at the University.

If this version is not agreeable to you, can you suggest an alternative version that is--without deleting the fact that Griffith practiced law for four years in Utah without getting a state license to do so? --Thattherepaul 14:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)thattherepaul[reply]

I see that you once again--for a fourth time--deleted the fact that Griffith practiced law for four years in Utah without getting a state license to do so. I have reinstated what you erased. I am going to post on the third-party opinion page, maybe a third party can come up with a neutral version that still remains truthful. --Thattherepaul 16:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)thattherepaul[reply]

Please drop me a line

Here. Thanks. Where is Dave II?Ferrylodge 05:49, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the record:

On Sarah Palin, your edit: ... 12:56, 31 August 2008 Smashingworth (Talk | contribs) (66,147 bytes) (→Public Safety Commissioner dismissal controversy: restoring more details to a hot topic issue (without overloading it)) (undo) ... removed mention of the fact that she is under an investigation for misconduct (in the issue of firing the public safety commissioner. I can assume good faith on that edit, but if you do it again I think that assumption would be untenable. Please do not remove this comment from your talk page, unless you archive the entire page and keep a link to the archive. Homunq (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. This specifically includes both registered and anonymous users."[1]Ferrylodge (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rollback

You could use rollback, so I gave it to you. This is the full spiel. Cheers, NoSeptember 17:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2009

The recent edit you made to List of Castle episodes has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. _Xeworlebi ^(t•c) 18:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Smashingworth! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 249 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Dale Wainwright - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Margaret A. Ryan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
James E.C. Perry - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jeromeaholmes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jeromeaholmes.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keith R. Blackwell

Hello, Smashingworth, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Keith R. Blackwell, appears to be directly copied from http://www.gasupreme.us/biographies/blackwell.php. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Keith R. Blackwell if necessary. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:TX Supreme Court Justice Don Willett.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:TX Supreme Court Justice Don Willett.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Judicial Nominee Practiced Law Without License in Utah" - Carol D. Leonnig, The Washington Post, Monday, June 21, 2004, page A01

[1] "Judicial Nominee Practiced Law Without License in Utah" - Carol D. Leonnig, The Washington Post, Monday, June 21, 2004, page A01

[1]