User talk:Smashingocarina
November 2011
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: We're Back! A Dinosaur's Story (film) was changed by Smashingocarina (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873273 on 2011-11-04T04:11:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Squirm (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Squirm (film) was changed by Smashingocarina (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941603 on 2011-11-04T04:29:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Out of Jimmy's Head with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. SeaphotoTalk 06:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hercules (1998 TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hercules (1998 TV series) was changed by Smashingocarina (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8739 on 2011-11-07T05:41:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mall Tycoon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mall Tycoon was changed by Smashingocarina (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956449 on 2011-11-09T04:41:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 5 albert square (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Master of Disguise, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Master of Disguise was changed by Smashingocarina (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883566 on 2011-11-13T19:47:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Smashingocarina (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The Great Valco is very displeased! Here i lay in front of you, honest man. I post information beneficial to the minds of readers, and it is constantly blocked? Here is an idea for you! Rather then have some cluebot revert everything intstantly, why not let an actual member with a comprehensive mind read the changes? The judgements here are too flawed. Valco wishes to spread knowledgeSmashingocarina (talk) 20:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed by CheckUser as to abusing multiple accounts. Talk page revoked. –MuZemike 20:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.