User talk:SlvrKy
About Social_network_analysis_software page edits
[edit]well, you took Commetrix out of the list above stating it is not open source or free: note that this holds for others in the list too, Ucinet is not free, Netminer is not free or opensource - and actually, if it is opensource it is stated in brackets. But ok, it does not need to be in this short list...
Then you changed the term academic licenses. Well it has academic licenses and is even free for 30 days (or negiotiated longer periods for PhD students) according to their cost overviews. This is not different from Netminer, which claims to be free, but it is not. It is just free for a limited time period too. Commetrix is mainly used in academic contexts, which you can see by looking at the academic papers using or citing it. The software is further run by a team of Drs and Profs., if you look at their website.
I would like to put it back to academic and commercial, some day...
What do you think about this?
Best, Anon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.178.210.226 (talk) 23:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I see that the sections detailing the history of infographic creation software were removed. The purpose of those sections was to contextualize Venngage's role within the history of rise in popularity of not only infographics, but amateur-made infographics using dedicated software. Seeing as infographics are one of the most popular forms on content on the web right now, the history of the software that democratized and multiplied their creation is of significance. Venngage is the second iteration of Vizualize.me, a software that was at the forefront of this movement.
I would like to better understand how I can position this article so that it meets the requirements. As it stands now, without those historically contextual sections, the significance of the role Venggage and other infographic software played is not adequately communicated.
Any feedback on which direction I should take would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks, Sara
- - Answered directly on the Talk page. SlvrKy (talk) 20:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, SlvrKy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fête des Vignerons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pierre Girard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)