User talk:SlumSlumy

Blocked

I've indefinitely blocked you for edit-warring at George Pell, making legal threats, and your failed attempts to vandalize another user's userpage. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SlumSlumy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

They were the ones edit warring, the talk page agreed to make the changes I was making. I tried to report another user for edit warring and tried to change their user page because I thought this was how you do it? They both ganged up on me without even participating in the discussion on the talk page? I didn't make legal threats? I discussed defamation which making legal threats says is what you are supposed to do. This is really confusing and exaggerated. SlumSlumy (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You clearly broke 3RR, and given your characterization edits you disagree with as "vandalism," you don't seem to understand how Wikipedia works. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At the George Pell Talk page, you said to another user: "You also open yourself to libel if you distort facts." That's not a "discussion as to whether material is libelous".--Bbb23 (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]