User talk:Sltiger

This user is a student editor in Bentley_University/NAS_348_Global_Climate_Change_(Fall_2022) .

Welcome!

Hello, Sltiger, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nike Article Peer Review - Dscsd21

The Nike, Inc. Wikipedia article does an exceptional job of laying out the company's history and operational effects. More specifically, the article's "Environmental record" section stands out as a major positive article outlier, displaying Nike's different positive and negative environmental effects. As for critique, I think that the sections under the "Controversies" section accounted for a larger portion of the total article length than necessary. I also feel that the sections themselves lack content (many were no more than two sentences long) regarding the controversial issues. Additions to the content of this section could benefit the article's lack of current detail in the "Controversies" section. I also feel that less time should be spent discussing Nike's financial information in the introduction, as there is a "Finance" section that causes repetition of the intro. This article is similar to the one I am adding to (Amtrak) in that the history section is the first section after the introduction, and is the longest individual section in the piece. Overall, this article is relatively well written, and therefore a good resource for accurate information. Dscsd21 (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]