User talk:Slow Graffiti

Cheetah speed

Hey there, just responding to your message to me. I agree with you that perhaps my change was not quite as indepth as it shouldhave been. However what I said was based on fact. I posted the following on your discussion page on the matter, but I thought I should address you personally so that you can change the opening paragraph of the article 'cheetah' with the correct information.

I posted as follows: The cheetah's speed is not the fastest of all terrestrial animals. A wildebeest stampede can reach speeds equal to that of a cheetah. The reason that cheetahs are so well known for how fast they are is because of their spectacular acceleration. The short bursts do reach the speeds that are mentioned above, but it is not true that they are the "fastest". It is more correct to say they have the fastest acceleration of all terrestrial animals. Having said that their top speed is nothing to scoff at as the cheetah is one of the fastest land animals, but I'm only saying that is is not correct to say they are the outright fastest terrestrial animal. My sources are the World Book Encyclopedia 2006, article: 'cheetah'(hard copy), and MSN Encarta(http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557976/Cheetah.html).

Thanks a lot buddy, sorry for the misunderstanding. User:24.83.201.192

Clapton

Hi, sorry I have a lot of pages to watch. In the future using an explanatory edit summary like remove paragraph per talk would help. Regards Arniep 20:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kalikambal temple

Hey, no problem - I know what you mean, after someone else edits the article, it's not always obvious that something funny is going on. Cheers! --P e ruvianLlama^(spit) 06:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger and lion

I answered your question regarding why it is the common misunderstanding and restore my paragraph, the 2n one. If you have any objection, let's discuss it, I'm willing to. I agree with you about removing the pit fight rubbish stuff, that's no scientific. Please note that I never mention anything like lions win tigers or vice versa. there's no such thing happening in the wild, so all we can do is make some indirect comparison. If you like zoology, hope youll see my point.Thanks. - User:203.15.122.35

Tiger and lion (cont)

Heelo! I just revisit the page and read your discussion. I did not mean to defend tiger or traduce the lion, the reason is just that so many people believe that: 1) Tigers do not fight, and even when they fight, they are wary: This is not true, tigers fight and kill, willing to risk injury. Tigers have been known to be heavily injured by : Wild boar, buffaloes, and procupine, group of dholes. 2) Lions born for fighting specifically: Sorry, I cannot agree on this. Lions are born to live in group, they hate hyenas as do they hate leopards and cheetah, like the tiger resents the leopard and dhole. They don't learn anything except the skill to hunt, when the male grows up, it leaves the pride voluntarily or forcably. They fight like other big cats, they don't train to do this, the winner comes in and the loser out, few years after, the winner will become a loser to a new, healthier one. For hunting in group, and resting too long(16-20h/day), lions do not possess good skills to hunt. The hunting skill reflect the capability of a predator above all. Now, the most important point: How can a predator be good fighter if they are not good hunters at first, since they are all unarmed hunter like us? Please understand that I am giving neutralized information based on observation, not opinion. That's why it's a misunderstanding? Tiger or lions, they are no king of anything, they are big carnivores living on meat, that's it, king is just a convention. So, perhaps you are right, there is no need for such thing in an article about tiger, and it may give people the iea that the writer is a tiger zealot. Hah hah, just kidding, any way, thank you for taking time discussing with me about an interesting point.

All the best!

Talk Page Archive

I just wanted to let you know that the page I archived (Talk:Knox (animator) was done so because an advanced user (I beleive an admin) suggested it.-NoUser 19:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo deletion

My sincere apologies if I deleted anything of yours (I can't get the compare versions to work right, or I could go back and check). I was attempting to re-add something which somebody else had removed of MINE. I thought I had left everybody else's stuff (which would include yours) intact. Again, sorry, if I didn't. I had absolutely no intention to do anything but re-add MY stuff.Sbharris 00:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Panther=

Sorry about that, I (wrongly) thought that all panthers that were black were black panthers. Thanks for correcting me and I won't make that mistake again. :-) Amelia Pound 08:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Berry

Hey could you fix the table in the Berry Article for me, I screwed it up and can't fix it!

Non-free use disputed for Image:Led zeppelin boxset.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Led zeppelin boxset.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for fixing that link on Klaas-Jan Huntelaar. I hadn't noticed it wasn't working any longer. Cheers, JACO PLANE • 2008-05-14 18:10

AfD nomination of Onza

An article that you have been involved in editing, Onza, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onza. Thank you. --Tombstone (talk) 08:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Solowing106

Well, good luck w/ ur masters. --Solowing106 (talk) 05:47, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Live

Hi, sorry you thought the sentence needed unmangling! Probably just a difference between UK and American English! Are u a Live fan and if so are u looking forward to seeing what the band can do with Chris on vocals? Regards from the UK, Ian. Thegraciousfew (talk) 17:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha...it wasn't bad, it just got swapped around from how I said it as well as reading "new song song." I am looking forward (somewhat nervously) to Live coming back! I have a feeling it will be good, if The Gracious Few was anything to go by. I listened to Unified Theory a little to see what Chris was like - what do you think? Slow Graffiti (talk) 04:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I had a few listens to Unified Theory on YouTube, more impressed with the singer than the songs, so I guess that bodes well for Live mk II. Ed sang some great songs with Live, but I saw The Gracious Few in a tiny venue in London last year and Chad, Chad and Pat just looked so happy and enthusiastic to be "starting again" - I think and hope that Live II could be something special. Thegraciousfew (talk) 18:34, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SumatranTigerToronto.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SumatranTigerToronto.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Slow Graffiti. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Slow Graffiti. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]