User talk:Sloverlord

This user may have left Wikipedia. Sloverlord has not edited Wikipedia since May 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Warp drive

Talk pages quickly get very hard to read unless everyone follows certain conventions such as adding new comments at the BOTTOM rather than the TOP, which is why I moved your comment.---CH 20:04, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I put it there because I didn't think it fit any of the existing sections (like about pictures and whatnot), but I guess that was a mistake. Sloverlord 15:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Crazy Monkey Games

An editor has nominated the article Crazy Monkey Games for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Monkey Games. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Crazy Monkey Games during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. I personally agree the article should be kept, but I felt compelled to nominate it because it was a contested prod. --JaimeLesMaths ^(talk!edits) 08:17, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion

Howdy, thanks for all the work on New page patrol. I noticed, however, that a few of the articles you have tagged for speedy do not seem to fit the criteria for speedy deletion. Poorly written pages are not usually candidates for speedy deletion, nor are close parallel content with related articles. I have added hangon notes to Jazz improvisation and Karaghul, since I don't see speedy critera to apply. Both need work, of course. Let me know if you have any questions. Otherwise, great work! --TeaDrinker 00:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, maybe I was being a bit hasty, sometimes I get a carried away with the speedy deletions. Let me know if there are any more concerns. Sloverlord 21:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, and judging by the results (one I thought was sure to be kept was deleted, although now recreated with a more extensive description), you may have been keeping a better eye on them than me. In any event, thanks for the note and keep up the good work. --TeaDrinker 21:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nippon Ishin no Kai listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nippon Ishin no Kai. Since you had some involvement with the Nippon Ishin no Kai redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tenaqzn'f Fbvyrq Gubat (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"American expansionism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect American expansionism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 7#American expansionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paul_012 (talk) 01:55, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]