User talk:Slotedpig

Kagome Higurashi

As you may have figured out by now, LucifaelsBride (talk · contribs) hates Kagome and her edits are tantamount to vandalism. I suggest that you always revert them before you try to make any constructive changes. Also, see my exchange with her on her talk page. And also see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Kagome under attack. JRSpriggs 05:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your efforts. LucifaelsBride (talk · contribs) has two sockpuppets which are 74.103.19.52 (talk · contribs) and XenocideLuvver (talk · contribs). JRSpriggs 08:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'll keep an eye out for those too. --Slotedpig 16:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kikyou "theory"

Look...I'm not even putting Kikyou's name in. Kohaku on page 3 of chapter 499 said that the light flowed INTO his shard, thus meaning it originated from a different place, in this case the shikon jewel. That's all.

And technically since Kikyou's light is in the jewel, her fight with Naraku is not yet over, she could be the reason for his downfall. So you can still have that she died at his hands but to say she failed is undetermined yet; she could still have a role in his demise thanks to her light being inside the jewel. It's like saying Aeris failed to save the planet from Sephiroth. Technically she summoned Holy before she died and used the lifestream to help out. She still defeated him even though he killed her.

Click here to comment after reading the bottom message

Hi. Can you see Sesshomaru's talk page? I posted a question there and I hope you can answer it. Only cause you seem to know a lot 'bout Sesshomaru. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 02:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of the change you made, I didn't know the categories for Sesshomaru had been discussed before. I saw the points regarding him being a magic user by nature, but maybe... why not include him in the villain cat.? ~I'm anonymous

I placed anti-hero at the top of his entry sentence. So, I heard Takahashi will end the manga this year. Is that in any way confirmed? When are they gonna distribute the rest of the Ani-Manga in the U.S.? (it went up to twenty last I noticed) ~I'm anonymous

Hey. I just came across this thought: Sesshomaru's kind of like Vegeta from Dragon Ball isn't he? Going from, supervillain to anti-hero? ~I'm anonymous

Yes. Kind of like that. --Slotedpig 15:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If he was indeed a supervillain, then the category will be added. Remember, unlike real people articles, we have to treat these fictional-related articles with enough out-of-universe information. Vegeta's categorization is a prime example of this. Now for Sesshomaru, my favorite character, since this is apparently settled which category would he (and Naraku & Kagura) fit in: Category:Supervillains without aliases? Or merely Category:Supervillains? Lord Sesshomaru

Are you available for opinion? Lord Sesshomaru

Sesshomaru isn't a supervillian. He's barely a villian. I wouldn't put him in either category. --Slotedpig 22:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understandale. What about Naraku and his henchmen? Which cat.? Lord Sesshomaru

I'm still awaiting the Naraku response before I act upon it — why are there not userboxes for other popular series like InuYasha and Dr. Slump? Is there yet a Ranma ½ userbox as of yet? Lord Sesshomaru

Compared to others in the supervillain categories, Naruku's a pushover. He's also affected a relatively small number of people. Unless he starts talking about taking over Japan, I'd leave him and his henchmen in regular anime and manga villains category. You'd have to ask an admin about the inbox thing --Slotedpig 19:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do that. Meanwhile, the first sentence at Naraku, "... is the major supervillain in the anime and manga series ...", should be changed. But to what? The categories Category:Anime and manga villains and Category:Manga and anime villains have been deleted. Any ideas? Lord Sesshomaru

Leave it the way it is for now, I suppose. --Slotedpig 14:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which category then for Naraku: Category:Supervillains without aliases? Category:Supervillains? Onigumo was his real name, or am I messing that up? If so just supervillains cat., right? Lord Sesshomaru

Category:Supervillains is fine. --Slotedpig 16:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rin

I have protected the article for three days, and therefore invite you to discuss here the relevance of adding that Rin is barefoot. If the edit war continues after the protection expires, I will consider other measures to prevent further disruption of the article. Thanks for understanding. -- ReyBrujo 03:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

InuYasha Character Guides

Do you know the name of the English version of the InuYasha Character Guide? I can't seem to find it anywhere, I have checked in my local anime store and they don't have it. Do you know what it is called exactly in English? I have asked them and they are not sure. I think it is "The Official InuYasha Guide" but like I said before, I am not entirely sure. Could you tell me what it is? You seem to know a lot about the Japanese guide,(I'm guessing it is Japanese because of it's Japanese name) so I am wondering if there is an english guide or if they are both the same one. Please let me know. Kagome 85 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 21:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The English version of the character guide is called Inuyasha Manga Profiles. Border's Books and Music, Barnes and Noble, and Amazon.com sell it. It's supposed to be a translation of Zusetsutaizen Ougikaiden, but there are a lot of mistakes in it.-- Slotedpig 23:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll try to get it at Chapters or see if they can order it, since that is the best book store where I live. Kagome 85 21:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]