User talk:Sloan21

Brangelina photo

Well since you seem to be so keen on the Brangelina photo issue, then you must also know (aside that the image has been around since January), that the image has not been linked to any author in the fan-site galleries that you have so diligently provided as source.

Being that as it is, it can be safely assumed that the author of the photgraphs (me, or whoever you choose to believe) is/was not interested in having copyright responsibilities upheld.

To finally settle the issue, I give you the information, that these photographs were freely distributed thorugh emails in mid January from an unspecified source within the Dominican p.r. and arts community, whereby the photographs can be considered as obtained for personal enjoyment, and not by a money-crazed papparazo. It is obvious that the pictures were taken with consent of the celebrities from someone sitting on their table or within their entourage.

It is your choice to either erase the picture or adapt the licensing information to that which I have been explaining. If you doubt my version, on my behalf I can only advise you to see my contributions list and see for yourself that most of my work is on issues related to my Dominican Republic.--Cuyaya 21:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did some changes. Check it out.--Cuyaya 12:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Maddox3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Maddox3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of the featured German article BDSM

Hi Sloan, I just would like to let ya know that I initiated an request for assistance with the translation of the text. See the discussion for more info. It would be great, if you could spread the news and try to find some more hands to make it happen. ;-) Regards.--Nemissimo II 11:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add Angeline Jolie's 3 golden globes awards to her article

You (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angelina_Jolie&diff=111563230&oldid=111486256 took away) her awards from her info box bc u say it makes i unnecc long(i understand ). However what do you think about a section of her article just about her awards? I think that is a tangible notion. I think you should put it in the article. I would but the page is locked. Also, please correct the link to George Wallace. Right now it links to george wallace the person and not the 97 movie Aj was in.

see Talk page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paris_Hilton#people_constantly_deleting_any_negative_information Ledenierhomme 02:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Maddox3.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maddox3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 17:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAC Maximus

I have responded to your request for a theology section for FAC Maximus. Please check the article and see if this now meets the FA criteria. Thanks for your helpful comments, I think they have made for a better article. -- Pastordavid 18:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments on the FAC for Maximus the Confessor. The discussion has closed, and the article has been promoted to Featured Article status. I think the article was greatly improved through the comments and suggestions offered in the nomination process, and was happy to see the process work so well. Again, thanks. -- Pastordavid 20:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angelina Jolie

Hi, I found out that you removed "The family divide their time between Los Angeles, California and New Orleans, Louisiana." in the "children" section. I was wondering why you'd remove that sentence. If you'd like proof, click here. Thanks.

Sli723 02:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:JolieCroft.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:JolieCroft.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 17:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BangBus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BangBus.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BangBus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BangBus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]