User talk:Slkj786

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Slkj786, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Pick Up Limes to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 14:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pick Up Limes (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Reconrabbit were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The language used in many places is inappropriate for Wikipedia, such as "Its overarching mission is to share resources on living a vibrant and uncomplicated life", "transformative", " Pick Up Limes has grown beyond imagination".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pick Up Limes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Recon rabbit 16:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slkj786! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Recon rabbit 16:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Pick Up Limes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Pick Up Limes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Felicia (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do generally respond to non-chatbot speedy deletion request arguments if I delete them. In this case, please note that other stuff exists is not a valid argument against deletion. It is entirely possible that some members of any given set are notable, and some are not. In that case, we'd only have arguments about the notable ones. Regardless of that, though, Wikipedia does not permit promotional material of any kind, and all articles must be strictly neutral. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 20:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The intention of creating the page was to add to the collection of Wikipedias plant-based platforms pages, not include promotional content. I added more references and information based on the first round of feedback, but am happy to remove whatever isn't neutral or is considered promotional :) Slkj786 (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Thank you for your feedback on the page Draft:Pick Up Limes. I am rewriting a draft to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view, incorporating more factual and encyclopedic language while avoiding promotional material. If you have any other feedback you wish to provide or comments on how to improve the content for future submission let me know. Thank you for your help! Slkj786 (talk) 21:45, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]