User talk:SlitherySentinel

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, SlitherySentinel, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to H. D. Deve Gowda seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Linguist ^talk|contribs 20:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SlitherySentinel, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SlitherySentinel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mick Mulvaney, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. We include temporary, acting officials in the infoboxes on Wikipedia. They may not be confirmed, but they still lead the agency. Also, please use edit summaries when making changes. 1990'sguy (talk) 23:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the consensus here, acting officials are not listed. Until the consensus changes, I will continue to make those changes. SlitherySentinel (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my comment on my talk page. Because you endlessly reverted my edits without using an edit summary, your edits really did look like immature vandalism. Thank you for clarifying to me, but please use an edit summary in the future so we can avoid all this. --1990'sguy (talk) 04:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SlitherySentinel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to have a reason for my suspension to be provided. I don't believe that I have conducted any vandalism.

Decline reason:

A checkuser has confirmed you are the same user as Snakeskinsam (talk · contribs). While that account remains blocked, you are not welcome to set up accounts to continue editing. All such edits are, by definition, vandalism. Yamla (talk) 22:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok. Thank you. SlitherySentinel (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:117th United States Congress

Hello, SlitherySentinel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "117th United States Congress".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]