User talk:Slestrella

Welcome!

Hello, Slestrella, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 1100100 (talk) 14:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Slestrella, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Slestrella! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Katie Rodan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Katie Rodan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Katie Rodan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Katie Rodan. Thanks! Bradv 00:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Rodan

Just to let you know, the article has been accepted at AfC and is live. Thank you! Bradv 14:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Katie Rodan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katie Rodan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katie Rodan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katie Rodan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Rodan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your apparent conflict of interest

It seems that you are here to promote Katie. You should read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a paid editor? Please read this. I really don't think you should be editing the article or weighing in at the AfD until this is cleared up. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other account

Please see here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]