User talk:Sleepsong

Welcome!

Hello, Sleepsong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Lra drama 08:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Welcome Message

Hello there, yes, I see you have been editing Wikipedia for a while, but I also noticed you hadn't had your talkpage started. And the good old welcome message is a great way to start it! It gives great pointers that are really useful to everyone. Anybody who has contributed well to this website and is without any discussions, I provide them with a welcome template. I hope that's OK! Happy editing! Lra drama 13:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would this be who I think it is?

It seems unlikely that someone else would have latched onto such a screenname, plus the edits for Pittsburgh... ^_^ How is life, Alisa? -Fuzzy (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sean, you are such a weirdo. Sleepsong (talk) 14:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deconstruction

Aww, you're no fun! :-D Seriously though, I'm surprised my edit lasted only 24 minutes. -- Brhaspati\^talk/_contribs 14:56, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sooooooo sorry! I really hated to do it, because yours was the most creative edit of the day, but... Argh, couldn't stand Wikipedia turning into Uncyclopedia. I swear, one of these days Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger are going to show up at Randall's apartment and shoot him. Then they're going to play in the ball pit. Sleepsong (talk) 15:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removal of Guernica image from top of PTSD

This was a major edit, for which you gave no explanation whatsoever. That's very bad form. The edit has been reverted. This image has been discussed at length. The discussion flares up again from time to time. The consensus is to keep the image, as is. You simply cannot drop in on this and remove it. That's very close to vandalism, and will be responded to (by me) as likely vandalism if anything like this happens again. I hope your manner of doing this was an oversight, and that you'll be more thoughtful next time. Tom Cloyd (talk) 04:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Photo Discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion regarding the better photo for an article Infobox? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 00:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sleepsong. Thanks for participating in the discussion. Sorry to bug you again, but two other photos have been added to the discussion since you voiced your opinion. Could you post again to indicate whether you have a preference for one of these two new ones? Thanks, and have a Happy New Year! Nightscream (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just register my vote as "I really don't care?" - Sleepsong (talk) 18:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]