User talk:SleepCovo

List of female Members of the London Assembly

Hi SleepCovo

Please see my comment at Talk:List of female Members of the London Assembly#Sortname_etc.

Per WP:BRD, please explain your reasons for reverting, and discuss them to try to reach a consensus. Please do not assume that you or any other editor WP:OWNs a page. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:44, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about you explain why you think your way is better before you make your changes as at the moment you make a change without consulting anyone! Rather hypocritical tbh! SleepCovo (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SleepCovo, As I have explained to you probably a dozen times, the way WP works is WP:BRD:

someone make a WP:BOLD edit
another editor disagrees, and reverts it
they discuss it to try to reach a WP:consensus

Now, please go to Talk:List of female Members of the London Assembly#Sortname_etc and explain the reasons why think that it is inappropriate for the list to be sorted by surname. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome!

Hello, SleepCovo and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Seagull123 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

--Seagull123 (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant content forking

Hi SleepCovo

Please do not create content forks, articles which duplicate an existing page.

You created[1] List of female Members elected to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom as content fork of List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom. The page you created appears to have identical content, and has an almost identical title (it adds only the word "elected", which is superfluous because all MPs are elected).

I have therefore redirected[2] the new page to the existing List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom.

I think you may have done this because of our disagreements at Talk:List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, but per WP:REDUNDANTFORK, that is an unacceptable type of content forking. Please discuss your concerns at at Talk:List of female Members of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, and try to reach a WP:CONSENSUS. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing photos

Greetings! I see that you've uploaded several photos of members of the US Congress to Commons. It'd make the photos much more available to other Commons users if you'd categorize them when you upload them. This isn't difficult: you can either do it while you're uploading, or by editing the file after you've uploaded. I've taken care of File:BradAshford2015.jpg, by creating the new category Commons:Category:Brad Ashford for him, then putting that into higher categories based on those for other members of Congress. You might want to go through some of your recent uploads and do likewise. If you've got any questions about the process, drop me a note at my Wikipedia talk page (which I check much more often than my talk page at Commons); I'll be glad to give you what help I can. — Ammodramus (talk) 15:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron. Thank you. NebY (talk) 13:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the new WikiProject Hampshire!

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Hampshire! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 2,690 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in Hampshire.

Browse the new WikiProject page
Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]