User talk:Slb nsk

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Slb nsk! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 19:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Yangcun

Hello, Slb nsk. You have new messages at Talk:Battle_of_Yangcun.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi there! I left some comments about your article and also added a reference. Take care, Pianotech (talk) 01:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! --Slb nsk (talk) 02:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deoria district

We already have an article on Deoria district, which you can find at Deoria. Please make all changes there. We are not allowed to have 2 articles on the same topic. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

District and city are DIFFERENT topics. DISTRICT has 5 different tehsils, and city of Deoria is only one of them. You made wrong thing. --Slb nsk (talk) 06:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please actually look at Deoria--it isn't about the city, it's about the district. We don't have an article about Deoria the city. Now, maybe we need one, but the way you're trying to fix it is the wrong way. In other words, if you want to make an article about the city, we can do that, but we're going to have to move around some pages, which you're going to need an admin to do. If you want, we can move the entire contents of Deoria to Deoria district, and leave nothing where Deoria is now. But please stop edit warring and discuss this--when editors disagree on Wikipedia, the correct step is to talk about it, not just fight to keep your version. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh...now it's getting to all be a mess. Please stop editing for a minute while we try and work this out. One minute. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, please clarify: How many place are called Deoria, and what are their types--tehsil, district, city, town, village, etc.? We can fix this, but I need more information to do so. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to official site of the Deoria district, it is divided on 5 tehsils: deoria sadar, salempur, rudrapur, berhaj and bhatparrani. District has its own magistrate, each of tehsils has its own magistrate. Census of India 2001 demonstrates, that town of Deoria has only about 100.000 habitants, and district of Deoria has about 2.5-3 million habitabts. Obviously, town and district are different things :-) --Slb nsk (talk) 06:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm checking now. We have the articles for Salempur, Uttar Pradesh and Rudrapur, Uttar Pradesh, but not for the other ones. So, it looks like we need an article titled Deoria, Utter Pradesh--that would be the correct title for the article about the town. Then, we need an article for Deoria district. So, I believe that the correct solution is to move Deoria to Deoria, Utter Pradesh, and undo the redirect and Deoria district. Then we need to make Deoria a disambiguation page (like Salempur), with links to Deoria district and Deoria, Uttar Pradesh. Does that seem to fix the problem? If so, I can do the necessary work; I think I'll need to do it because some of it involves moves that only admins can do. Afterward, you can go ahead and add all of the new information to the article.

Sorry to make this seem so complicated; at first I couldn't understand what you were doing, then I realized that what needs to be done in order to be sure that all of the edits are properly organized and attributed is fairly complex.

If this is right, I'll take care of the changes later (I probably won't get to it for at least 3 or 4 hours, and may not get to it until tomorrow--depends on if I have time to work on WP later tonight). Qwyrxian (talk) 07:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are right. Your merging produced a big interwiki-conflict, and I simply tried to repair links :-) --Slb nsk (talk) 07:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I've fixed it now, mostly. Deoria district is for the district, Deoria, Uttar Pradesh is for the tehsil, Deoria (Lok Sabha constituency) is for the constituency, and Deoria is a disambiguation page. I started looking through the list of "What links here" on Deoria, because many of those need to be disambiguated, but I only got part way through; some I'm not sure on, and I'm about out of time for this right now; I'll try to do more tomorrow. You're free to edit all of the articles now. Sorry for any confusion and for responding a bit aggressively at the beginning. Let me know if you need any help. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK --Slb nsk (talk) 17:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yevgeni Korolkov

The article Yevgeni Korolkov has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bihco (talk) 07:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ningyuan, Anshan listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ningyuan, Anshan. Since you had some involvement with the Ningyuan, Anshan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). GotR ^Talk 05:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Provisional Siberian Government (Vologodskii)

The article Provisional Siberian Government (Vologodskii) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

it is a Unsourced article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mdann52 (talk) 16:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mergers

Dear Slb nsk, I am aware of our slight difference in opinion with regard to the merger of the Heerenveen article. Please note that I have suggested a merger in the exact same circumstances for Beek as well. Because it would have the same arguments, I would suggest to keep most of the discussion on the Heerenveen page. I understand from some of the other comments on this page that you are particularly worried about some interwiki links. I do note that other language wikipedia's have different customs for the split between these kind of municipality articles, but that I would ensure through proper redirecting that those would still link properly to the English language article. CRwikiCA (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Per the rules at WP:PROD, any editor, including the creator of the page, may remove a prod for any reason, or even no reason at all. Once that is done, you have to take the article to WP:AFD instead. So I declined your re-applied prod on Siberian Republic; if you still fee the article should be deleted, you can nominate it via AfD. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russia Eastern Outskirts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have a message!

Hello, Slb nsk. You have new messages at Jayadevp13's talk page.
Message added 12:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

- Jayadevp13 12:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zemstvo of Maritime Territory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chita. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Slb nsk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Slb nsk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions!

	Order of Pastor
	For outstanding work on a subject of my interest. PennsylvanianSocialDemocrat (talk) 19:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This award, in this case, is for your creation, Zemstvo of Maritime Territory.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]