User talk:Slayer35

Turkish attendances

Hi! I'm going to update the Average attendances of European football clubs but on my source unfortunately only the Turkish attendances are missing. Do you any web site where I can find the figures for 2007-08 in the Süper Lig? It can be on Turkish as well. As I said, I only need the numbers. Thanks in advance! Regards -Lemmy- (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. For an update I actually need the figures for 2007-08, not for 2006-07. I would need a source for that. -Lemmy- (talk) 16:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles about Turkish footballers

Hello. I noticed you have created many articles about Turkish footballers and I appreciate your efforts to help Wikipedia's coverage of Turkish football. However, I wanted to mention that many of the articles are about players in the third and fourth level of Turkish football, which is not a fully professional level (it appears to be semi-professional). Accordingly, these articles are about players that fail WP:ATHLETE and are not notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. Some of the articles cover players that have played in the Super Lig or TFF First League and those articles are okay because the leagues are fully professional. I have tried to improve the articles for those players and asserted notability by indicating the player has appeared in those leagues (or in one case, the German Bundesliga). For the other players, I have requested that the articles be deleted since the players are not notable. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like any help. Thank you. Jogurney (talk) 17:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind reply. I may be wrong about the status of the TFF Second and Third Leagues, but I remember another editor said the Second League was semi-professional in a discussion we had a few months ago. However, I know that Göztepe and some other large clubs play at these levels, so perhaps the league is fully professional. Do you know if the entire squad for these clubs earns enough money from football that they do not have to do other work? Even if Göztepe is fully professional, the entire league would need to meet the standard (some of the more than 50 clubs are from smaller towns so I wonder if are players are full-time). I'll be happy to remove all of the prods if I have this wrong. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 23:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Goztepe08-09.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Goztepe08-09.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Göztepe logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Göztepe logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 20:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 2009–10 TFF Second League

The reason for the merger was as following: The 2. Lig is the third division of Turkish football, split up in multiple groups. Hence, a comparison with competitions of similar strength and size, for example the German Regionalligen, the French Championnat de France amateur or the Spanish Segunda División B and Tercera Division. All of these competitions have their own season articles as well:

As you can see, although these leagues have multiple divisions, there is only a single article for these, containing the league tables, results and top goalscorers, where available, of all groups. This practice is a well-established consensus among the participants of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football in general and its season article task force in particular. I don't see why there should be any exceptions from this consensus for 2009–10 TFF Second League. The information of the subarticles you mentioned (2009–10 TFF Second League Group 2 and 2009–10 TFF Second League Promotion Group) can easily be included into the parent article without making it too large in size.

Aside from that, the existing 2009–10 TFF Second League article should be expanded to include complete league tables, results boxes, top goalscorer lists and additional items like maps FOR ALL GROUPS rather than breeding a microcosmos of several small articles. In relation with this and the fact that you are also the main contributor of Göztepe A.Ş. season 2009–10, I would like to point you to Wikipedia:Content forking and its guidelines.

Before you might probably take exception, let me assure that I have nothing against you. I just think that the content of said spin-off articles should be (re-)integrated into 2009–10 TFF Second League, based on the argumentation above. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 23:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Adnan suvari.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Adnan suvari.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Gursel aksel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gursel aksel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Goztepe legendary team.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Goztepe legendary team.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TFF 1.Lig logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TFF 1.Lig logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Goztepe08-09.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goztepe08-09.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 15:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Goztepe cups.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goztepe cups.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 15:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Goztepe-fb.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goztepe-fb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 15:42, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Goztepe supporters.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goztepe supporters.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 15:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Goztepe 83.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goztepe 83.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 15:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ali Bilgin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Göztepe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Göztepe logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Göztepe logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Goztepe lineup.png

The file File:Goztepe lineup.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2008–09 Göztepe S.K. season

The article 2008–09 Göztepe S.K. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stats article that fails WP:GNG and does not have presumed notability under WP:NSEASONS either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2009–10 Göztepe S.K. season

The article 2009–10 Göztepe S.K. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stats article that fails WP:GNG and does not have presumed notability under WP:NSEASONS either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]