User talk:Slavedave5150

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Same-sex marriage in the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please note that Wikipedia administrators can block editors who engage in vandalism and other disruptive behavior. Thank you. Frank Fontaine (talk) 18:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 18:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to LGBT, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with the article, bring it up on the talk page. Do not resort to insults and personal attacks. Reach Out to the Truth 18:49, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slavedave5150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry about these edits- now that I have researched wikipedia and learned a little more, I promise I will no longer vandalize this site

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sock of banned user. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:52, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.