User talk:Slavatrudu

Welcome!

Hello, Slavatrudu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Grand master ka 23:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

K_\alpha in characteristic function for inverse gamma distribution

Hi! You rightly pointed out that in the formula for the characteristic function of this distribution K_\alpha is used without mentioning what it is. Can you name it, please? Give a link? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.72.39.82 (talk) 22:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting the White Buses article

Hi, thanks for correcting my English, I am not that fluent and it's nice that you had the time to correct various errors I made. I do however question the changes you made to dates and nubers. When it comes to dates, the style guide for Wikipedia says as follows:

"If the topic itself concerns a specific country, editors may choose to use the date format used in that country. This is useful even if the dates are linked, because new users and users without a Wikipedia account do not have any date preferences set, and so they see whatever format was typed. For topics concerning Ireland, all member states of the Commonwealth of Nations except Canada, and most international organizations such as the United Nations, the formatting is usually 17 February 1958 (no comma and no "th"). In the United States, the Philippines, Federated States of Micronesia and Palau, it is most commonly February 17, 1958. Elsewhere, either format is acceptable. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English for more guidance."

styleguide for dates

So according to that 9 April should be equal to April 9 if one try to write "UK English".

Regarding numbers I noticed you removed the separators, the guide says that "very large numbers can be divided up bu commas" [1] - the numbers in the article are not very large but as far as I can see around other articles here it's rather common to use the separator.

I will try to translate the rest of the article from Norwegian this weekend and I hope you can continue to correct my errors. Ulflarsen 17:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danish Speed skaters

I change it to Category:Danish speed skaters to match all the others in Category:Speed skaters by nationality. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tomas Gustafson

Hi, seeing you introduced a statement about the '83 championships in the article, could you take a look at my question on its talkpage? Cheers, Niels|en talk-nl talk (faster response)| 20:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Education in North Korea

You're right, I can't find any evidence that there is plagiarism in North Korea, although it wouldn't surprise me at all considering that it's surrounding neighbors have an identified problem with plagiarism. It is probably because the country is so closed that we don't hear of the plagiarism outside of it. Their communist so they have extremely tight control of the media. Anyway, I'm going to make sure the article is fixed. Scifiintel 13:55, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of IRead

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on IRead, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because IRead is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting IRead, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Gavin Hall

hello. thanks for the note. generally journal articles and books are entered in separate sections with 'bibliography' and 'publications' the most commonly used headings. --emerson7 16:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Norwegians

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Norwegians. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Norwegians. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Slavatrudu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Asgeir Dølplads - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flunkeyism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flunkeyism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flunkeyism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 19:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Slavatrudu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]