User talk:Slarson
I am very impressed by your page.
I see that you recreated an article on this philosopher immediately after it was [deleted]. I'm guessing that you felt justified in doing so because you added some text, expanding what was deleted. Having read the stub, two comments:
- I find the comparison of Chatton's argument and the quote by Holmes to be problematical, partly because I don't follow the logic of the comparison, but mostly because this appears to be a clear violation of WP:NOR - I doubt very much that any citeable source has made this comparison, and so it's clearly original research/original writing.
- I think you could add some information from the Stanford Encyclopedia without violating copyrights - certainly factual info such as date of birth and death, being advisor to two popes, that critical editions of his work have only recently become available, etc. If you're willing to remove the Sherlock Holmes quote (or able to provide attribution for the comparison), I'd be happy to help on adding info.
-- John Broughton (♫♫) 13:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Politicians with Doctorates- Request for Move
[edit]As I've indicated through the article's talk page, "Politicians with Doctorates" appears to focus solely on American politicians, making the generalized label politicians confusing for those who are searching for any of a number of well-known politicians with doctorates from other countries besides the United States. Furthermore, all of the tables and fields in the article are applicable only to American politicians. As such, I am proposing that this article be moved and renamed "American Politicians with Doctorates." This is not only because of the above stated conflicts, but also due to the unlikelihood of any current regular contributers taking the name to reformat and update the article to include a broader range of international politicians. Patrolmanno9 22:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Slarson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of List of United States politicians with doctorates for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States politicians with doctorates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States politicians with divinity degrees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)