User talk:Sky-surfer/Archive 01

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Thank you for advice. I just want to remark that disambiguation notes could be put in many cases at the bottom of the page; I feel that many users are annoyed by that notes at the top, they can keep away one's focus from the main objective.

Ambient music

I've moved discussion of your post here Peter G Werner 18:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Modern gnostic mysticism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hetar 03:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD etiquette

One thing you should not do is remove the AfD message on an article nominated for deletion, like you did in this edit: [1] – which was misleadingly labelled as a minor edit to boot – and again here: [2]. This is considered vandalism, and this behaviour almost certainly ensures that anything important you might have to say will be ignored. Lambiam ^Talk 12:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware that Wikipedia's policies were so formal, and that Wikipedians' first issue and agenda is only "formalism" with no respect for sincere works; I suspect that some users are deliberately misunderstanding the content of my posting (or, very likely, pretend to). If the point is your sincere concern about formal breaking of rules, please accept my apologies, becouse I am new here and I don't know exactly how to behave. If you are not going to accept my apologies, and still want to prevent me to add further information on that article and similar ones, please let me know immediately; in this case, I'll have to assume that your policies are wrong for me and I will no longer release any contribute in any subject. Good luck.

== Skysurfer

House of Windsor

Hello, may I ask you why you were interested in editing Royals' related articles some months ago? I am asking becouse I found gossips and faked information posted by anonimous users, so now I am tryin to investigate the matter. Skysurfer 7:00 am, 4 may 2006

Can't remember any systematic reason; outside of my key areas (generally, but not exclusively, UK geography) I tend to wander around picking up points. I also take part in stub-sorting & categorising and I vaguely remember being reverted on categorising some people as being members of the House of Windsor who other editors said were not. HTH. Saga City 10:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Vandalism

I think u need to see a doctor.You dont own wikipedia...and besides if u are tired of something,,doesnt mean others are...this is the first time i have met a psycho on wikipedia..really strange --Yahoo 14:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete comments

Hi. I have restored the comments that were not made by you, including an accusation of vandalism. Please help to hold users accountable for their comments by preserving them, unless the comments are destructive, nonsense, or spam. Removing warnings is considered a form of vandalism. Ref: Wikipedia:Removing warnings#Can I do whatever I want to my own user talk page? —mjb 06:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I am not really an expert on Royal Houses, and my recent edits were likely the result of my personal troubles (a paranoid syndrome). I am very sorry for this behaviour, plese accept my apologies and feel free to remove any information I edited. Best regards. --skysurfer 21:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]