User talk:SksnnsBrujdbduggtllakiejwkwb.00227

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 20:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SksnnsBrujdbduggtllakiejwkwb.00227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, so I got blocked because I unintentionally violated wikipedia guidelines(To be specific, my sourcing is what got the administrators/editors to perceive it as Disruptive editing and WP:CIR. For WP:CIR I got that because I got warnings, but I didn't bother reading them because they were so long. Sorry I will do better in the future). Why did I violated the guidelines? because I didn't know how to edit articles correctly, and why is that? because I didn't bother reading the guidelines, and that was my fault. I'm sorry about it. I promise to do better in the future. What I would do differently in the future is sourcing the right sources and listen to the other editors who point out issues with my edits. For the type of edits I would like to make, are expanding articles by adding more into them or copy editing. Most of the articles I'm interested in are related to music or movies, but maybe I would edit on other areas if i was interested in them. For an example of an edit I would make on an existing article, I wrote my answer below with examples of the type of sourcing I would use and why I would use them to demonstrate my understanding of the guidelines

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Please find someplace else to troll, you are not subtle enough to handle Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But i was not a sockpuppet User:SksnnsBrujdbduggtllakiejwkwb.00227 talk 21:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)}}[reply]