User talk:Skraz/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Skraz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Page Curation update
Hey all :). We've just deployed another set of features for Page Curation. They include flyouts from the icons in Special:NewPagesFeed, showing who reviewed an article and when, a listing of this in the "info" flyout, and a general re-jigging of the info flyout - we've also fixed the weird bug with page_titles_having_underscores_instead_of_spaces in messages sent to talkpages, and introduced CSD logging! As always, these features will need some work - but any feedback would be most welcome.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon in Madison
 |
.jpg) |
Skraz, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:
- Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon
- Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)
- Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare
RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.
Hi, at the above article it wasn't an Afd you replaced but a prod, which I've removed.ThanksAtlantic306 (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Credo's confessions
Hi Skraz, i will welcome myself as Nevets3, as that will be my username when i create an account. I would like to know "why" you think this information is not constructive. There are many recordings on youtube of "The Reptilian Agenda". This recording here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQRcflH-esI received over 30,000 viewers alone. David Icke on his website has over 70,000 members, and therefor a lot of people have came to know Credo Mutwa due to this video and his association with David Icke. The confessions he made, are non litigious as he made those confessions himself. I am sure in heindight he regrets having made those confessions, but he did. Those are not just small revelations, those are "extreme" and "revelational". They are also criminal, and i do actually believe that it is a "crime" to attempt to cover up illegal activity. If Credo Mutwa wants to admit to such vulgur attrocities, then he has to accept that it needs to be part of his biography. Credo Mutwa has confessed to, by the standards of western culture. hidious and perverse crimes, and while it might not be good for his buisness for too many people to hear and become aware of those confessions, wikipedia is not an advertising tool to only document what is good selling points for people. Wikipedia is here to document accurately the most crucial and important aspects that are recorded about someone. Confessions of Cannabilism, sex with dead corpses, sex with animals, receiving oral sex for elderly women with their false teeth out, is extreme;y illegal in Western culture, and something that is "extremely illegal" can never, in any jurisdiction be considered, unconstructive. As for links, you dont get any better link than to that of the horses mouth. He said it himself recorded during interview. Many thanks, and eventually i will not only be contacting newspapers, i will also be seeking who and why a confession to crime was removed and dusted under the carpet...Also before you come back to me with something like, wikipedia is not a site for people making allegations. I am not making allegations. I actually think he probably did not do any of those acts. I genuinely think he was just being the usual Charlatan trying to sell something, and made a deeply embarrassing mistake. But what does it matter what i think? he confessed to it on camera, and therefor it needs to be taken seriously — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.1.119 (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- The IP is a sock of User:The Reptilian Agenda. Doug Weller talk 11:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
Hi Skraz,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Skraz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)