Jump to content

User talk:Skizm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article RAM Raider, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:RAM Raider. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Bwithh 06:30, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to RAM Raider

[edit]

Your recent edit to RAM Raider (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to RAM Raider, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Schutz 17:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for incivility and disruption. If you wish to make useful contributions, come back tomorrow. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Due to block evasion for the purpose of continued incivility and lack of any constructive edits, this account has been blocked indefinitely. --Sam Blanning(talk) 16:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my talk page

[edit]

From my talk page:

Fuck off

[edit]

There's your excuse to block me. Prick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skizm (talkcontribs) 18:44, 30 December 2006

I did not block you, and neither was I looking for an excuse to do so — you just got warned because you blanked a page and removed an AFD notice. Schutz 20:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC) (for the record: this probably relates to this warning).[reply]