User talk:Skiwalkko

Recent edits to Suzi Quatro

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s). In particular, something potentially negative or defamatory about a living person needs a reliable source Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2013 (UTC) What part was negative or defamatory?[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Suzi Quatro. You deleted text with citation; broke another citation; added contentious WP:BLP information without a citation. — Peter Loader (talk) 21:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I made a mistake but it isn;t controversial she didn't have much chart success in the 1980s or 90s its a fact

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Suzi Quatro. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I undid unreferenced changes and a broken reference — Peter Loader (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013, continued

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Can the Can, you may be blocked from editing. Removal of referenced content. The edit summary's suggestion that Suzi Quatro "isnt a major rock star" is WP:Original Research — Peter Loader (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Rolling Stone (Suzi Quatro song)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. In particular, you really shouldn't be removing significant information with cited sources an adding uncited information in place. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stiarts erid, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Betty Logan (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha what a joke! Wikipedia is perhaps the most shit site I have ever come across.You aren't allowed to edit anything without it going against some insignificant pathetic rule some wanker made up. There's a really hateful, rude, biggoted, bloody minded, bitchy, loathsom old hag called betty logan who is probably overweight and a bitter old lesbian with it, that really enjoys being a bitch. She thinks she knows it all and really doesn't shes as thick as shit really. The bitch from hell removes edits regardless of quality and reverts things that are true or that help an article because she likes to think she's all big editing pages on wikipedia. Well, wikipedia is mocked in schools and colleges for being unreliable but these mini little hitlers think they are all big and powerful editing pages anyone vcan edit. Well you are all pathetic insignificant wankers that desperately need a life! It's all about who agrees with you and whether a stupid rule agrees, as to whether you can make an edit. Even true facts are reveryed by this corrupt poorly run site. I hope no one has to put up with the wankers I've had too. I never want anything to do with this shit, unreliable, corrupt site again and plan to let as many people kknow how shit wikipedia is, as possible. Thanks for bloody nothing, and all those who got in my way. Well you can all go and fuck yourselves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!