User talk:Skisloony

November 2013

Hello, I'm Marek69. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of countries by military expenditures without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Marek.69^talk 14:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Middle power. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Middle power was changed by Skisloony (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95848 on 2013-11-18T01:17:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 01:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skisloony (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account is not a sock puppet. nonsense fabrications!!! I have no multiple accounts and I am not evading a block or ban!!!Skisloony (talk) 01:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Same articles, same edits, same daffy unblock requests. Kuru (talk) 03:01, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

this account is not a sock puppet. nonsense fabrications!!! I have no multiple accounts and I am not evading a block or ban!!!