User talk:Skintothemax

Welcome!

Hello, Skintothemax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:20, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Kerling

Greetings! I have modified your edits on the Edward Kerling article that you have worked on to eliminate the duplicate citations that seemed to bother you. Wikipedia doesn't use duplicate citations in that manner. If you would examine my edits, you will see one method of handling duplicate citations and one of many methods on the presentation on citation and reference information at the bottom of an article. The use of the term "ref name=" lets you use the same reference information many times easily. You need to add cites for the references "Ex Parte Quirin". law.cornell.edu. and "National Socialist Saboteur Trial". loc.gov. as you probably intended using some method that won't produce the duplicates. My formatting is what I have always used and it works very well in most instances. A word of caution about working on pre-existing articles, if a citation and reference formatting has been established by a earlier editor you should use their formatting. I hope this has helped, if you have questions contact me on my talk page. Cuprum17 (talk) 14:49, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for formatting those citations for me. I am still relatively new to the editing world and the article on Edward Kerling is the first article that I have created on my own. I was quite confused on why the reference list began to duplicate my inline citations as I had never seen that happen before. I added the remaining citations using your format (to be best of my knowledge) and they appear to be in working order. Thank you once again and feel free to offer any further tips and/or advice. Skintothemax (talk) 20:15, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Everyone has to start somewhere. Keep editing and don't get discouraged. I trust you know how to find my talk page if you need further help. Cheers! Cuprum17 (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Thorlak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icelandic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Caution

You must avoid making edits like this, which violate WP:BLP and ultimately reeks of WP:NONAZIS. ❯❯❯Pravega^g=9.8 08:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Nightenbelle. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Caroline Ellison, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]