User talk:Skinner887

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Waco Siege, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Waco Siege was changed by Skinner887 (u) (t) deleting 69157 characters on 2009-12-02T07:10:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Waco Siege, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits to that article and Waco, Texas are inappropriate. Edit constructively or do not edit at all. —C.Fred (talk) 16:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:C.Fred, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thejadefalcon ^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 17:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nja²⁴⁷ 17:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skinner887 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The editor that blocked me is working for the government, and I'm trying to expose the government's dark secrets. Sounds like a conflict of interest to me.

Decline reason:

Sounds like a misguided conspiracy theory to me. TN X Man 17:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skinner887 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The thing about conspiracy theories is, they're not theories, they're facts.

Decline reason:

Your unblock rationale does not address the reason for which you were blocked. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skinner887 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, my rationale for unblocking directly addresses the reason for my block. I was blocked for exposing the government's false account of the bombing in Wacko, Texas, and the admins that blocked me and reverted my edits are secretly working for the government. So they got a vested interest in trying to silence me. The truth is out there.

Decline reason:

Block is valid, and your talk page rights have been removed to prevent you further wasting our time. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.