User talk:Skier Dude/archive/archive Nov 10

Snowball?

Wondering if you wanted to snow this, and throw some salt on for good measure: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakur (musician). Thanks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

May You Please Delete File:Wikiwikiweb1994.jpg Because the Image Is Not Real Or May Be From A different source than the uploader sayed so on the file page (see here for info on why this image should not be in the commons) --S1312 (talk) 21:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You Have New Messages here --S1312 (talk) 01:20, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BlocK? abosulely maybe...

maybe you should block WikiUni (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) after all. Today he/she uploaded this claiming it to be from Amazon.com even though a search of amazon here yields nothing of the sort. She/He doesn't appear to understand the seriousness of uploading false or unattributed/unattributable images.

The user has not edited since 10/5 and I've been trying to keep an eye on any additional activity. There's been given the equivalent of 'last warnings', so any future misbehaviour will result in a block. Thanks for keeping an eye on this :) Skier Dude (talk 03:40, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haver a look at...

File:HowieCosellProfile.jpg is a blatant copvio. It is a screen grab from an episode of the Odd Couple tv show. Currently at a deletion discussion but when I saw it I tagged it as a speedy for being blatant copyvio. A new admin declined the speedy because it did not have a source listed and than tagged it themselves {{di-no source}}. I wouldn't bother with the slight wheel warning but leaving a blatant copyvio around because a new admin without a real grasp yet of images and related policies is ludicrous. Thought you could jump in and solve it by closing the deletion discussion early. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:48, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Lang image deleted

Hi there. Per your message last week about the image on the Laura Lang Wikipedia page, I reached out to someone at the corporate communications team at Digitas, who said that they'd contact the Wikipedia permissions email address and let them know it's okay to use. The image was deleted anyway - can I just reupload it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JGwiki user (talk • contribs) 16:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) No, do not upload the image again. When the OTRS ticket is processed, assuming the permission given is acceptable, the image will be restored with a ticket is generated showing that permission was given. If you upload it now the image will likely just be tagged for deletion again. Hope that helps as Skier Dude seems to be offline for a few days. ww2censor (talk) 17:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eric Birley 003b.jpg

Hi Skier Dude! I notice that you flagged File:Eric Birley 003b.jpg for deletion. I expected this since I orphaned it yesterday. On advice, I removed it from the wikiarticle I had uploaded it to because there was already another image of the subject there and I wanted to ensure compliance with WP:NFCC#3a. Once I did that, I should have flagged it myself for WP:CSD#G7. Thank you for taking care of this for me. (By the way, you forgot to notify me with {{subst:di-orphaned fair use-notice|1=Eric Birley 003b.jpg}}.) Thanks again! — Spike Toronto 18:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need to tag the non-free files, a bot will catch them in a day or two... but you can always use G7 to speed up the process and sorry about the notification - guess Twinkle hiccupped there :( Skier Dude (talk 00:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can empathize. Last night my Huggle was not reporting to AIV. I had to file manually. — Spike Toronto 05:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011 films

Can you please revert your additions of Category:2011 films? Not only are none of these films considered 2011 films yet as they aren't released, some of the films you added to the category don't even have a release date yet. BOVINEBOY2008 06:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to be bold & revert if you wish, but note that there are projected release dates for a goodly number of them. Skier Dude (talk 06:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am reverting. Films that have a scheduled release date, even if that is tomorrow, are still unreleased films. This is a policy that could be discussed, but no consensus really has been found yet. If you disagree, I'll gladly join in a conversation at the project talk page. BOVINEBOY2008 06:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not empty

Category:3rd-millennium establishments in Norway only appears empty. Category:21st-century establishments in Norway is in it, or at least it should have been. You should be extremely cautious adding {{db-c1}} to categories with the job queue apparently being several months for some categories with template-added entries. __meco (talk) 07:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still showing as empty - both Category:3rd-millennium establishments by country & Category:Establishments in Norway by millennium are parent categories - "21st..." is not being transcluded either 'up' or 'down' for it. It appears that there's something messed up with "21st..." as 3rd-milennium is not showing that it's "related" to it (at least on the 3rd milennium page. Doubt that server lag would be that bad for it's not showing up for 11 days. Not sure where to look to see if you can get the cache purged - maybe ask at the admin/tech issues board?

And, I do let them sit about a week in the list I use before tagging them - with the added days for the 'pseudo-speedy' there's usually about 2 weeks before it's noted as empty before it's deleted. Skier Dude (talk 07:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check out User talk:Explicit/Archive 28#Request for undeletion of categories. Explicit mentions that the queue "can possibly take a month or two" in worst cases. __meco (talk) 08:02, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PLZ SEND GUIDLIANCE TO REMOVE ALL STEPS

PLZ SEND GUIDLIANCE TO REMOVE ALL STEPS FOR ALL STATED - CLEARLITY , additional references or sources for verification. .

sources or references that appear in third-party publications. original research or unverifiable claims.  notability tone or style .

personal reflection or essay. advertisement neutral point of view..

confusing or unclear for some readers. Tagged since October 2010.

too long. Some content may need to be summarized or split. Tagged since October 2010.

copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling. Tagged since October 2010. 
wikified to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since October 2010. 
general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Tagged since October 2010.

It is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject, and may not conform to NPOV policy.

material not appropriate for an encyclopedia. improper references to self-published sources.

PLZ HELP SOON FOR PAGE OF Mr. ADITYA SHARMA OUR ASPIARANT FROM BANGLORE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.193.132 (talk) 11:25, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Could you please undelete Talk:The Last Man (2002 film). Somehow it got separated from its article, which is when you deleted it. Now I moved the article as well. Thank you. Debresser (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Manhattan Transfer

Ciao. Ti scrivo in italiano visto che nel tuo babelfish hai indicato "it-3", meglio forse di quanto io possa scrivere in inglese. Scusami se ne approfitto :-)

Ho visto che hai scritto alcune voci dedicate ai dischi dei The Manhattan Transfer qui su en.wiki. Volevo segnalati qualche imprecisione che riguardano i dischi live. Man-Tora! Live in Tokyo è un disco uscito nel 1993 e la track listing è completamente diversa (vedi it:Man-Tora! Live in Tokyo) . Invece nel 1987 è uscito un album che si intitola The Manhattan Transfer Live che contiene quelle canzoni. Un altro disco intitolato The Manhattan Transfer Live è uscito nel 1978, ma la copertina alternativa (alternate album cover) è quella dell'album del 1987 (vedi The Manhattan Transfer Live). Insomma, c'è un po' di confusione :-) Se tu avessi voglia di sistemare le cose puoi fare riferimento alle voci su it.wiki che dovrebbero essere abbastanza corrette. Ciao e grazie. --Amarvudol (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie mille! Ho controllato e c'è stato un duplicato nella nostra discografia - il 1987 è corretta (non c'era 1981). Anche, la 'track listing' en it:Man-Tora! Live in Tokyo è corretta anche (Penso che sia stato un 'copia e incolla' errore tra una al->altro). Ho aggiornato le .en pagine. Spero che questo cose chiarite. Inoltre, mi piace il template [1] - lavorerò per uno per il nostro sito. Skier Dude (talk 03:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Ashwin Bhadri" Page

Hi,

Can you please let me how we can add "Ashwin Bhadri" page since you have deleted it.

I have added the links to external sites like twitter and linkedin.

He is a renowned speaker, and we would like to create a page for him.

Please see his speaker page. http://speakerwiki.org/speakers/Ashwin_Bhadri

Please guide us what we can do.

Thanks.

Equinox Admin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Equinoxlab (talk • contribs) 06:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re that picture

I own the copyright for that picture on the How to Swim (band) page. I thought I'd jumped through the right hoops to ok it. Obviously, I haven't. What do i need to do to get it reinstated? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkwilson (talk • contribs) 11:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

change to Warren Harding Article

please note change to Warren Harding article regarding copyright of book cover scan. thanx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meros Felsenmaus (talk • contribs) 15:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]