Jump to content

User talk:Skibz777

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Skibz777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Lyght 06:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Sock'puppet/Troma Entertainment

[edit]

Conflict of Interest

[edit]

Do not delete templates

[edit]

Aquacadets

[edit]

Hey, I'm a big fan of the Aquabats as well and wanted to join the aquacadets but cant seem to find a site or anything for them to sign up. If you know of how to do it will you please let me know? Asatruar (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pansy Division

[edit]

Yes, you're right, Pansy Division could use a more cohesive and better-referenced bio... it seems like a lot of times the music articles aren't up to the standards of other articles in terms of references, etc., and there is a tendency for people to tack on trivia, etc.--Larrybob (talk) 18:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Computer Bites!

[edit]

Since Computer Bites! is not blatant vandalism, it cannot be speedy deleted. I agree that it is a hoax, so I have brought it to WP:AFD. If you would like to participate in the AfD discussion, feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Bites!. Nice job for catching this hoax! Cheers, Cunard (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Ged UK (talk · contribs) has closed the AfD as speedy delete. Cunard (talk) 19:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry Poppin' Daddies

[edit]

I have begun a review of an article you nominated at Good Articles. The review can be found here Talk:Cherry Poppin' Daddies/GA1. I trust you will be able to participate. maclean 04:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Moss- which school?

[edit]

You added Jason Moss to two Oregon high schools. Did he attend both? Can you add a cite (to a source) to each indicating he attended those schools? tedder (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I guess I saw your two edits to the same page and thought they were different pages. Yeah, you've only listed it once. Can you include your reference/cite? We try to include cites on all school attendances. Yes, there are many missing, but it's easier to do when they are added. tedder (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sourcing Lloyd Knibb

[edit]

I was looking all around for a source a few hours ago and couldn't find one, at least nothing worthy of Wikipedia. I came back online just now to see if there might be one somewhere now. I am glad to see you have found one though I am still saddened by the news of the death of one of ska's founding members. I am thankful I've had the luxury of seeing the Skatalites a few times following the 90s ska revival.

Also, I didn't know if there was a way to send messages so I thought I'd just uselessly fill up your talk page like so. Feel free to delete this section. ;)

Emperorchaos (talk) 10:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry Poppin' Daddies

[edit]

I hardly ever look at that article though it's on my watchlist, but I see your username pop up a lot. Well, I finally read the article for the first time in ages tonight, and I have to assume that it is so excellent because of all your hard work. So congratulations! Having been around Eugene for the early days of the band (I could supply all kinds of original research), and noting that band articles on Wikipedia generally suck, I have to say that this is a hell of a good article! I totally support you trying to get it to FA. I wish I still had a cassette player because I would play my 4 From on High cassette in tribute. I have a friend who at one time had every CPD poster from a certain era. Let me find out if she still has them. A scan of one of those might make a nice addition to the article. If you decide to try for FA, let me know. Cheers! Valfontis (talk) 02:17, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's surprising what can result from just pecking away at an article for so long. I appreciate the offer of help; the only thing I think I really need outside of proofreading are more illustrative pictures from the earlier days of the band. Let me know if any of those posters get scanned, I'd love to see them. :) Skibz777 (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, just noticed your reply. I'll ask around about pics, too. My friend just moved and is busy, but I'll see if the posters still exist. Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eyes on The Aquabats

[edit]

Hey Skibz, not sure if you've noticed the recent edit-warring at The Aquabats but thought I'd bring it to your attention. I'm going out of town for the weekend and will be off-wiki, so it'd sure help if you'd keep an eye on the article. I started an ANI thread about it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#The Aquabats if you want to read a little more about it. --IllaZilla (talk) 04:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The edit-warring account was blocked and the article has been semi-protected until the 7th, but he threatened to sockpuppet and get his "friends" to help, so keep an eye out. --IllaZilla (talk) 04:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll keep a watchful eye. Skibz777 (talk) 05:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For all the hard work you've been putting into The Aquabats. IllaZilla (talk) 17:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're a girl aren't you?

[edit]

SO obvi. --64.141.107.11 (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]
If you earnestly cared about verifiable material, your edits would have been made in consideration to the context and content of each page; in choosing to undo each and every edit of mine in the last few weeks, you not only removed what you found to be egregious original research (such as an album's length and label, notoriously contentious points of sub-journalistic bias, I'm aware), but removed multiple unrelated edits correcting formatting errors, grammatical errors and even my own removal of unsourced content (e.g. the non-existent, unlinked genre "astro-rock" in Reese Roper's infobox, for one). By removing edits of mine which had nothing to do with citable content, by removing edits of mine which were sourced, by removing edits of mine reiterating content already present in the article body (e.g. moving mentions of Reese Roper's studio guest appearances from biography to discography) and by removing edits of mine with reckless disregard for the deliberations and consensuses previously reached in an article's talk pages (e.g. The Aquabats' infobox genres, a long-suffering source of habitual vandalism by genre warriors), that seems to indicate to me that your primary concern isn't encyclopedic veracity. Look, I'm not upset, I'm just disappointed...I thought we had really developed a strong rapport together over these last few years, but, alas, I guess emotions can't get in the way of rules and regulations. I've sourced the length, label and Billboard charts on The Aquabats! Super Show! Television Soundtrack: Volume One, but I recommend making use of Wikipedia's Talk Page feature for those times when you start second guessing if an album is really 47:58 instead of 47:59. Skibz777 (talk) 15:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I earnestly do care about verifiable material, sometimes perhaps over-zealously, I readily admit. In the process I have been known to revert several good edits because of one bad edit. Or even sometimes made the mistake of assuming it was a bad edit when it was in fact, actually a good one. This was most likely the case when I woke up this morning and failed to notice that the diff I was looking at had been truncated and as such appeared to be a bad one. Then I noticed the unsourced bit at the end of this edit and was convinced it all required reversion. Next edit when looking through your contributions that irked me was this one which, to be honest, does require sourcing. Then I reverted this for OR which it appeared to be (correct me if I'm wrong please). Next was this one. I do think it does need sourcing, especially considering it is a good article. My next revert was for this edit. Now here again, I admit, I reverted 3 other edits to revert this one which contained unsourced info. I could go on and analyze each edit, their respective reversions and the reasons therefore but perhaps that is unnecessary nit-picking. Yes admittedly, I was hasty in some of my reversions, however I do feel some were justified. What I should have done was sent you a message and discussed it with you, had you point out my errors and me request sourcing where need be as apposed to dropping a warning on your talk page. I may have even done that until I read your sarcastic edit summaries that is and decided to rather not engage as it seemed more trouble than it was worth and you didn't seem to be very approachable. On that note, thank you for starting this discussion. My sincerest apologies for not assuming good faith with regards to some of your edits, for my hasty reversions and for the warning on your talk page (which I have removed). There are some things that I feel do need sources but I will discuss them with you as opposed to random reverting. Finally, I didn't realize we have had dealings with each other in the past. That is most likely due to poor memory from my side so forgive me for jeopardizing any good standing I may have had with you. I hope we are able to work collaboratively going forward. Robvanvee 16:52, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough; I tend to have a rather arrogant streak, so I apologize if I came off as argumentative. While I certainly agree on the value of reliable sources and recognized some places where references were indeed necessary, I was more confused by the reversions than anything else; for the soundtrack album, for example, I see I should have cited the Billboard chart placements, but I didn't see why such things as album length, label or small credit fixes ("Matt Chapman" -> "M. Chapman") were removed along with it. As there was stuff like that on almost every page you reverted edits on, I guess I got paranoid that there was some kind of personal beef, so again, I apologize if I've been rude.
Anyways, here's a few small notes on the specific edits you linked to. I typically do my best to keep everything up to standards; I'm not perfect, but every edit is indeed in good faith and is never done without reason:
  • Having edited The Aquabats' page for many years, genre is hands-down the most contentious part of the article; it's been prey to many genre warriors and you can see in the talk archives that almost every editor has a different idea of what should go in the infobox. The four genres currently displayed are what was agreed upon when it was decided to create a separate "Musical Style" section and therefore I semi-regularly revert it back whenever somebody changes it. As you may know, changing infobox genres is no small edit and, seeing as there's already an entire section on genre, I find it necessary to bring up such changes in the talk page first.
  • As far as the most recent unsourced additions to The Aquabats' main biography, I'll admit culpability for that since the band is currently in the middle of a lot of activity (new web series, new album, new tour, etc.) and as such the page will likely be continually updated over the next few months...I'll confess I should have added citations to those bits, even though I planned for them to inevitably be replaced with more information and better references. With niche bands like these, they only receive sporadic attention from reliable sources and that occasionally makes citations hard to come by: it's not like Rolling Stone is covering the new Aquabats single, directly linking to the song via YouTube/Spotify/etc. is the only source available for the single release until confirmation of a new album and its accompanying press and publicity. Likewise, some areas are totally gray: for instance, member Ian Fowles is still credited as "Eagle 'Bones' FalconHawk" on social media and the most recent album but is credited as "EagleBones FalconHawk" in the band's TV series and most recent web videos. Trying to remain thorough and up-to-date with a cult band - especially one which has its own extensive and very unencyclopedic in-universe mythology - is not always an easy task.
  • Ironically, I was actually planning on removing that edit to the Daddies' page anyways (and I since have); I debated over whether or not it was worth mentioning, but seeing as the details of the change are too vague and small enough to be generally inconsequential, it's better left off entirely, even with sources.
  • The Reese Roper discography confused me the most since my only additions outside of formatting and adding his credits for each album was the five guest appearances. I see why it's necessary to cite the guest appearances, but, again, with the reversions undoing both a formatting error as well as restoring other unsourced material ("astro-rock", as well as keeping the same unsourced information about guest appearances in the biography), I assumed the implication was I had to source the credits for each album. Granted, I feel that entire article could benefit from a re-write with reliable sources since there's very few on there. Skibz777 (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for explaining Skibz777. I'm glad we could talk this over and if I had forgotten about past interactions, I certainly won't forget this one. All the best. Robvanvee 10:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NPA, it's probably best not to discuss editors in edit summaries. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blood Hook

[edit]
Notice

The article Blood Hook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no known resources supporting it having its own page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting on Five Iron Frenzy

[edit]

Please explain what part of WP:PSEUDOHEAD you don't understand well enough to make this edit instead of this incorrect edit? Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like more of a "you problem". Thanks for the fix! Skibz777 (talk) 11:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RadVentures! false redirect?

[edit]

Hey Skibz, did you say in your edit summary three months ago that you haven't updated the Super Show! article to include all the info and episodes of RadVentures!, but "that is where it will go as there's not enough coverage to justify its own article?" Animal Control Abuse (talk) 21:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even remember anything I did last week, let alone three months ago. I'm not sure what the issue was, but as far as the YouTube series, there's not enough media coverage to justify making a separate article for RadVentures!: there's only an OC Weekly article to cite, and it barely even mentions the show. Seeing as RadVentures! was the result of the Kickstarter to make "New Super Show Adventures" and were originally referred to as "mini-episodes of The Aquabats! Super Show!," not to mention continues the continuity of the original series and even retains its theme song and title card, there's no other logical place to put that information other than as a sub-section of the main Super Show! article. Unfortunately, I just have not had the chance to sit down and do a lot of Wikipedia editing lately, but I'll move it to the top of my to-do list when I have the time. As of now, at least RadVentures! is passingly mentioned in the intro paragraphs, so hopefully it's not too confusing of a redirect. Skibz777 (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot Skibz, but there's only three more mini-episodes left, and then The Aquabats will have enough twelve mini-episodes released on YouTube. Is that right Skibz? Skibz? Oh well. Animal Control Abuse (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crabs (film)

[edit]
Notice

The article Crabs (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable, unreleased film. No indication that it will be released. Has been in "upcoming" status since 2018. Production not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Project Kill for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Project Kill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Kill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Perempuan Bergairah

[edit]
Notice

The article Perempuan Bergairah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noah 💬 18:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TruckersWoman.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TruckersWoman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WaitressTroma.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WaitressTroma.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Surf2theendofthetrilogy.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Surf2theendofthetrilogy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NightmareWeekend.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NightmareWeekend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WhenNatureCallsDVD.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WhenNatureCallsDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tips on writing music pages?

[edit]

I've noticed that you have a lot of experience writing pages for musical groups. Would you be willing to look over my Stretch Armstrong draft? I've gathered a bunch of information and I'm torn about how to condense information about specific concerts. Should I just note notable bands that Stretch opened for instead of mentioning individual concerts that weren't reviewed? I feel like my "Concerts 1994-1995" section is pretty weak. I've noticed that FA band pages hardly ever mention individual concerts, but for a band like Stretch Armstrong, the concerts are the main thing I have to go off of. Anyway. I would appreciate any advice you can give! Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:48, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scoring (film) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scoring (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scoring (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 22:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TromaScoring.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TromaScoring.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Donahue (drummer)

[edit]
Notice

The article Tim Donahue (drummer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't reach individual notability per WP:BANDMEMBER. Most of the "Career" section is either unsourced or based on the subject's own website

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ductwork (talk) 18:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Was a Teenage TV Terrorist

[edit]
Notice

The article I Was a Teenage TV Terrorist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TVTerroristVHS.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TVTerroristVHS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:MU330 albums

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:MU330 albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChumpsOnParade.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChumpsOnParade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CrabRangoonMU330.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CrabRangoonMU330.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LiveOhYeah.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LiveOhYeah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MU330Press.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MU330Press.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MU330Selftitled.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MU330Selftitled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MU330XmasFun.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MU330XmasFun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UltraPanicMU330.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UltraPanicMU330.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RadioactiveChickenHeadsShow.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RadioactiveChickenHeadsShow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BatPussyDVD.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BatPussyDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dialing for Dingbats

[edit]
Notice

The article Dialing for Dingbats has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:36, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fortress of Amerikkka for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fortress of Amerikkka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortress of Amerikkka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Guy (help! - typo?) 17:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EastEndHustle.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EastEndHustle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FreddyPharkas.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FreddyPharkas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Skibz777&oldid=1216450392"