User talk:Skeptical scientist

Welcome to wikipedia!

Welcome, alias. Have fun editing. Althai (talk) 23:55, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you alias. I will. skeptical scientist (talk) 23:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary Primary account.

This is a secondary account of user:Althai. I created this account to distinguish between my mathematics/science/philosophy contributions and my other types of contributions. From now on I'll try to contribute mathematics articles under this account. skeptical scientist (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is now the primary account, and has been for a decade. I haven't made any contributions under the old account since 2010, and have fully abandoned it. skeptical scientist (talk) 21:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opposite day/liar paradox

Essentially, both are the same, so there shouldn't really be two pages on the same thing. A mention in the "Liar parodox" article would suffice - oh, and the history hasn't been lost - access it here. Will ^(talk) 21:39, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self

Add relative randomness to algorithmically random sequence

Borged

>You said that R. Fiend had been "borged", and I was wondering what you meant by that? Instead of answering my question, you instead chose to delete the comment... If you were worried about it being a personal attack, I don't see how he could take a message on your talk page as a personal attack, so maybe you can explain here... skeptical scientist (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I thought I had done both: (a) replied to you on your talk page and (b) deleted my comment. Apparently before heading off to sleep, I failed to complete (a).

My concern was that you might have interpreted it as a person attack and if you happened to think it showed a lack of respect, then others might as well. I have no wish to alienate R.fiend. Even though I don't agree with his view on this topic and am at a loss why he is entrenched, he is earnest and honest.

The reference is to the Borg (Star Trek), which I had assumed (incorrectly) most people would understand.

kind regards, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 01:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

>I understand that it's a Star Trek reference; I just don't know who is supposed to have assimilated him or what exactly you meant by it in context. skeptical scientist (talk) 04:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Not important. It was probably meant as a humorous reflection that some had fallen prey to the propaganda, i.e, become assimilated or "borged".

best regards, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 04:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

>P.S. that was me. I started this debate logged out, and tried to be consistent about it so that I wouldn't appear to be a sock puppet, but I suppose that it was inevitable that I'd forget eventually. I'll post logged in from now on. 75.21.74.124 (talk) 14:41, 30 July 200

Not a problem for me. I appreciate your taking the time and straightforwardness to let us know.

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

here. We've needed help for a while. Saksjn (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up

>Due to my concerns about the use of the category generally, which was sparked by the inclusion of Expelled, I started a discussion on it here under categories for discussion. Since I know you feel strongly about the inclusion of Expelled in this category, I wanted to give you a heads up, and encourage you to participate in the debate. skeptical scientist (talk) 06:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. We've been drowning in Tropical Storm Fay and I'd have missed the discussion otherwise. Thank you again for your perceptive consideration.

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 19:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks once again, math dude!

--UnicornTapestry (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meagre sets

Thanks for your comment at User talk:Nbarth#Are meagre sets F_σ?

I’ve replied there, and you are correct – I’ve corrected it. Thanks!

Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 19:05, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help with Galton-Watson process

I think the notation on the definition isn't particularly described well. I do not want to attempt to edit it, in fear I will change the meaning. Can you help. See my Comment on the page. --MATThematical (talk) 16:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Skeptical scientist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Skeptical scientist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Skeptical scientist. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 02:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]