User talk:Skapur

This user may have left Wikipedia. Skapur has not edited Wikipedia since 19 June 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives

/Archive 1

Deleting a sentence

I noticed that you changed the article about Clemens Kalischer. I had put that he lived in Massachusetts (which is true). You felt it necessary to remove that. For your information he is my grandfather so I should know. Email me at akc123cheese@hotmail.com if you want to discuss this deletion or just add to this page under my writing.

I did not do that change. It was done by SCEhardt --- Skapur 03:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's spelled "tip"

not "typ".[1] Argyriou (talk) 01:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC) ok. --- Skapur 01:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A longish article can yet be a stub

On this edit of yours: if you simply look at the article, you'll immediately get the impression that it's a lot more than a stub; but if you ponder what it actually consists of, I think you'll agree that it's a mere stub with lists attached. The lists may be good (I hope they are, as I did a lot of the work on them), but the body of the article is unaffected by them. -- Hoary 07:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The proper tag for this article would the {{expand}} tag rather than a stub tag. --- Skapur 16:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it would. But consider all the effort that goes into, and the benefits from, "stub-sorting". {{expand}} undoes all of that, unless perhaps there's a capability for {{t1|expand|photographer}} etc. that I haven't noticed. -- Hoary 22:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help with sailing vocabulary?

Hi Skapur, as I've read that your an (English-speaking) sailor, could you help me with the following question? What is the English word for the "harness" worn on sailing ships to prevent people from falling overboard (or off the ratlines etc.)? Is it "lifebelt", can it be "lifebelt" even though a different word is more common, or is "lifebelt" plain wrong, and that harness is actually called something different? Thanks in advance. Generally, is there a forum on the English Wikipedia where sailing-related questions can be asked? Thanks. --Ibn Battuta 00:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually more of a motorboater than a sailor but "Harness" seems like the correct word. See http://www.google.com/search?q=sailing+harness and the first link is to a manufacturer. Also see http://www.sailingusa.info/sailing_safety.htm for general safety, they use the word "Safety harness", search for this in the text and the surrounding information (look for the words: safety line, jackline and lifeline). You may want to find a sailing school or sailing supply store near you. The people there are quite knowledgeable about these topics. --- Skapur 00:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll try my luck! --Ibn Battuta 02:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reina

I removed the tag, but only after cleaning it up, looks much better now, SqueakBox 03:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I tried to clean up myselff but just do not know enough about the topic to do it properly. --- Skapur 03:14, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas19

Thanks for vote of confidence. I have had a few run-ins with Lukas19. I notice others have as well. Lately he started telling me how American whites were not as pure as whites in Europe. He also claimed he could tell anyone who had even a tiny amount of black heritage by sight. He also claimed that the US government standards on race were not of any value since he, as a Norwegian teenager, does not "recognize" their validity (being the great authority he is). He also called me stupid several times and ignorant on the talk pages, apparently for not agreeing with him. Once it was because I could not find a quote in a sea of crap on the talk page. One of the quotes that he claims I made I cannot even find on the talk page at all. Probably a mistake. I do notice that when I admitted I had made a mistake, he attacked me as stupid however. He also gave me two references, one which supported his position and one which refuted it (he thought they both supported his position I suspect). When this was pointed out, he claimed that the authors of the article that did not support his position were incompetent and did not know the literature as well as he did (even though this was a Nature publication and came after the paper which supported his position). He rants, he raves, he huffs he puffs. It gets a bit tiresome after a while however. I suspect he is heading for trouble unless he can clean up his act and control himself. --Filll 22:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thulean/Lukas19

I see that you are one of the roughly 10 people who has had trouble with this user Lukas19 in about a one month period. I have noticed a disturbing pattern. Take a look at his talk page for more details.--Filll 23:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Vote Hezbollah → Muslimgauze" and archiving this talk page

what are you going to do with this debate in Wikipedia:redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 3? Most debates are closed as of right now, and yet there aren't any more votes this time.

Also, your talk page is getting too large. Rather than removing everything, would you like to create an archived page? --Gh87 23:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot, here's a guide to archive this talk page in Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. --Gh87 23:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have archived older discussion --- Skapur 00:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Error using AWB

hello, when you removed stub tag from long article using AWB (on article Croatia at the 1996 Summer Olympics) you also removed (by accident?) all links for sports, I fixed that --Ivelimir 11:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually links in section headers are discouraged and AWB automatically removes them . See the Manual of style section on this topic at :Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(headings)#Linking. Also it interferes with the "my preferences"'s "Editing" tab checkbox: "Enable section editing by right-clicking on section titles (JavaScript)" --- Skapur 16:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When is a stub not

Hi. Noticed that sometimes u unstub articles I've worked on, and was wondering how you know when it ceases to be a stub? Is there a "rule of thumb"? Seasalt 11:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to look at WP:Stub for the guidelines and rule of thumbs about stubs. The Moto Morini article I destubbed is definitely not a stub. Also the yearly Isle of Man TT articles that were long are not stubs. The rule of thumb that I end up using as a practical matter is that I normally look to see if it exceeds at least 800 words and as per WP:Stub#Removing_stub_status I am bold in removing the stub tag. There are other more appropriate templates like the expand template for those articles. I am sorry if I removed the stub tag on a short article. Can you pleaes give me an example so that I am more vigilant in the future? Thank you --- Skapur 15:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You made no mistake, I just wondered what the criteria was, so I could unstub at the appropriate point in an article. From the look of my watchlist tonight you just went thru the lot. Oh well, for future articles....thanx. Seasalt 10:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of stub - request for category

Hi, if you remove a book-stub template, as you did to The Examined Life, would you mind replacing it with a Category:Books for the articles where no subcategory of books is already on the article?

If you don't, the information that "this is a book" is no longer available to people who scan for such things. --Alvestrand 21:20, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about Removal of stub on Melissa Farley

May I request that the "Stub" notation be reinstated on this article.

It is currently rated as such by the WikiProject Biography (please see Talk:Melissa Farley page). Also an examination of the article will show that the actual article itself is very short and that the page mostly consists of an extensive bibliography of articles written or contributed to by Ms. Farley. CyntWorkStuff 22:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done --- Skapur 22:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks CyntWorkStuff 22:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Juana Azurduy de Padilla

Hi, I'm writing about the article Juana Azurduy de Padilla. I noticed that you removed the stub tags from the article on the basis that it was "long", but I really disagree with the idea that a mere paragraph constitutes a "long article". A paragraph very short for say, an article in a newspaper or a journal, and it is also very short for an encyclopedia entry. I'd keep the stubs until the article reaches at least three paragraphs in length. Asarelah 03:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I see the problem. The article is long if you count the commeted out Spanish text. --- Skapur 04:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Occulting Light

Do you have a reference for the use of occulting lights on buoys? My understanding is that occulting lights are always on lighthouses. Buoys depend on batteries and solar cells for power, and generally don't have the power available to run an occulting light -- they use low duty cycle flashers to preserve electrical power. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You make a very good point. Actually occulting lights are a very small fraction of all lights to begin with (There are none on the Missisipi river system). However, there is nothing that prevents one from existing on a buoy. I could find very few on a buoy. Examples are lights # 29255 (Oc G 4s) and 29260 (Oc R 4s) in Hawaii's Kalihi Channel in the fourteenth district in http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/LightLists/V6Complete%5B2%5D.pdf BUT you can find them on the "Fictitious nautical chart" in every USCG lights list (page 30 of http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/LightLists/Ref2005W.pdf) is an example, of an occulting buoy (R "4" Oc R 6s). --- Skapur 02:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous 3RRV report

You have incorrectly placed a 3RR violation report for me. It only depicts three reverts of the same material. I assume this is due to an honest misunderstanding on your part about Wikipedia:3RR, however the standard is 4 reverts in 24 hours of the same material. Please delete the 3RRV. Fourdee 03:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will let an administrator decide that. --- Skapur 05:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to explain why you are taking issue with the reverts? The other user appeared to just be vandalizing the page. Fourdee 08:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a content dispute and not vandalism. --- Skapur 16:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The admin disagreed. Fourdee 20:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. That is why I left it up to the admin to decide. It looked like a revert war and revert wars are not good for WP. --- Skapur 21:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amfipoli, Greece

Hi. I made added some and some external links on a page about a town called Amfipoli in Greece. Could You check it out and maybe it edit please? Thank you! Neptunekh 22:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ducati Multisrada 1000DS and 620

I'd forgotten Multistrada 620 and 1000DS, but came across it, and the cleanup notice. Have revised it, but I am not that confident of having it right, so was hoping you might re-vet the article, and express an opinion on the cleanup. Happy New Year anyway, from Australia. Seasalt 12:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK --- Skapur 04:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Seasalt 11:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two Greek Articles

Hi! Could please look at a the last pharagraoh because I added that paragraph I at Amfipoli:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amfipoli. Also I created an article called Nea Potidea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nea_Potidea Would you mind looking at them please and cleaning them up? Thank you! Neptunekh 01:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persons/people

You recently added comments to the discussion on the Person article, supporting my objection to User:Lucy-marie's changing of 'persons' to 'people' without justification. You also suggested, I think not seriously, that the article should be split into two - one for British English and one for American English. Having received one comment supporting her, from a friend, she has done precisely that so that there are now two new pages Person (British English), Person (American English) and the original Person page has been made a REDIRECT to Person (disambiguation). At the head of the discussion page for each new article, she has written "The page was created to resolve a dispute over the use of the words people or persons." Now, clearly the 'dispute' was never resolved and certainly was not going to be resolved in her favour in any case, though I was prepared to wait for more comments. I have now nominated both new articles for deletion, with the original article to be restored. I would be grateful if you would give your views in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Person (British English). Emeraude 10:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD

I just wanted to point out that Palestine and Palestinian territories do not represent the same region (per your comments on Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_January_1#Category:Palestine). One refers to a historical region, one most widely refers to political definitions of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, though a minority of those who do not accept that Israel exists may use it to refer to that place to, however that is not the use made by the categories up for renaming. Cheers, Tewfik^Talk 18:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nea Potidea

I added new information in the Nea Potidea article:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nea_Potidea Could you please take a look at it and edit it? and Could you also put it into catagories? Also can you tag http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potidaea as the main article? Thanks! Neptunekh 16:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:50, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You are still listed on the Admin coaching request page

Your name is still listed at Requests for an admin coach. If you are no longer looking for a coach, or you currently have one, please remove yourself from that list.

The instructions for getting or receiving a coach have changed. It's now a self-help process: just look for a coach from the list of coaches, and contact one. See the instructions on Wikipedia:Admin coaching. Good luck.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Dear Skapur, Thanks for the edit in William of Baskerville page. Much appreciated. --Cyril Thomas 01:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Admin coaching

Hi Skapur - are u still wanting coaching? If so, I'll be happy to be of assistance to you if you'll have me as a coach. I'm also working with user:WikipedianProlific, but I can definitely also work with you. Lemme know, Cheers, Rama's arrow 03:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

AIDGAP

Hi - I notice you tagged AIDGAP for cleanup. I'd be happy to do some improvement work on this - can you let me know what you feel needs doing. SP-KP 08:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Coast Guard article mergers

Hi there. I have proposed merging Federal Maritime Security Coordinator, Officer in Charge Marine Inspections, Federal On Scene Coordinator (USCG), and the U.S. section of Captain of the Port into Sector Commander. Just wanted to see if you have any thoughts on the topic. --Pesco 23:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi Skapur, regarding Woodturning, the link cleanup was per WP:EL and WP:NOT#LINKFARM. While external links are useful, an article should not contain excessive links, or every possible link on a given topic. If you take a look at the relevant guideline and policy you'll see what I mean. The remaining links provide a more than adequate starting point for anyone interested in learning more about the subject. Thanks, Deiz talk 02:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POK OR AZAD KASHMIR

dear friend, your CONCERNS RECTIFIED IN PRESENT VERSION..please have a look at where the POK or Azad Kashmir links lead you to..your opinion is solicited at the article's talk pageCityvalyu (talk) 02:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your opinion please...

I have asked for opinions as to whether it would be appropriate for me to move this article to my rough work in my user space. Since you were one of the five other people who made an edit to it I'd appreciate your opinion as to whether the other edits rise to the level of being considered "intellecutal content".

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results
Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content
Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan
Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:07, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary

As a current or past contributor to a USCG Auxiliary article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject United States Coast Guard Auxiliary, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the United States Coast Guard Auxiliary. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

COASTIE I am (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:United States Coast Guard

Portal:United States Coast Guard, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:United States Coast Guard and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:United States Coast Guard during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]